Literature DB >> 19046257

Process for obtaining informed consent: women's opinions.

Silvana Ferreira Bento1, Ellen Hardy, Maria José Duarte Osis.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In Brazil, every study involving human beings is required to produce an informed consent form that must be signed by study participants: this is stated in Resolution 196/96.(1) Consent must be obtained through a specific structured process.
OBJECTIVE: To present the opinions of women regarding how the process of obtaining informed consent should be conducted when women are invited to participate in studies on contraceptive methods. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eight focus groups were conducted, involving a total of 51 women living in the metropolitan region of Campinas. The women involved in the study were either participating in a clinical trial in the area of women's health or had participated in such a trial in the previous 12 months. A thematic guide was used to conduct the focus group discussions; the discussions were recorded, transcribed and a thematic analysis performed.
RESULTS: In general, the person who invites a woman to participate in a study should be a member of the research team but not the principal investigator. Information relating to the study should be given orally and in writing, both individually and in the group setting. Study volunteers should be informed about, among other things, the risks, possible side effects and discomforts, including long-term effects. The use of audiovisual aids to provide information was suggested.
CONCLUSION: The process for obtaining informed consent was seen as a means of establishing a relationship between the volunteers and the investigator/research team. The information that the study participants expected to be given coincides with the requirements established under Resolution 196/96. The use of audiovisual aids would improve understanding of the information provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19046257     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00183.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev World Bioeth        ISSN: 1471-8731            Impact factor:   2.294


  4 in total

1.  Promoting human subjects training for place-based communities and cultural groups in environmental research: curriculum approaches for graduate student/faculty training.

Authors:  Dianne Quigley
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Survey on Using Ethical Principles in Environmental Field Research with Place-Based Communities.

Authors:  Dianne Quigley; Alana Levine; David A Sonnenfeld; Phil Brown; Qing Tian; Xiaofan Wei
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  What potential research participants want to know about research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen Michelle Kirkby; Melanie Calvert; Heather Draper; Thomas Keeley; Sue Wilson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  "Preterm birth risk, me?" Women risk perception about premature delivery - a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Thaís V Silva; Silvana F Bento; Leila Katz; Rodolfo C Pacagnella
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.