Literature DB >> 19042679

Rural health leaders pipeline, 1990-2005: case study of a second-generation rural medical education program.

John R Wheat1, John E Brandon, James D Leeper, James R Jackson, Dennis W Boulware.   

Abstract

A pipeline model has been suggested to increase the rural physician supply. This study is an institutional case report used to describe the context, development, and in-house evaluation of the University of Alabama Rural Health Leaders Pipeline, 1990-2005. This program was developed at a University of Alabama School of Medicine branch campus to target rural students at multiple levels, elementary schools through residency, and includes a minority focus. Requirements to enter the medical program include living 8 years in rural Alabama, meeting admission requirements, and affinity for rural lifestyles. Twenty-six percent of 316 high school participants, all 40 students in the minority-focused college program, and 3% of 90 medical program students were African American. The program includes (1) puppet shows in elementary schools depicting different health professions, (2) Rural Health Scholars Program for 11th-grade students, (3) Minority Rural Health Pipeline Program for college students, (4) Rural Medical Scholars Program, a 5-year track of study in rural community health and medicine, and (5) assured admission to family medicine residency. Outcomes studied in this case report included medical school performance, graduation rate, selection of family medicine specialty, and rural practice location. Medical scholars were anticipated to experience academic difficulty, select family medicine specialty, and locate in rural practice more often than peers. Compared to peers, medical scholars showed lower scores on preclinical courses and USMLE steps 1 and 2, reflective of their lower MCAT and GPA scores, but had (1) similar graduation rates (95% vs peers 84%), (2) higher family medicine selection rate (47% vs Huntsville 27% vs Tuscaloosa 12% vs Birmingham 4% [OR compared to Birmingham 22.7, 95% CI 10.5-49.4]), and (3) higher rural practice rate (67% vs peers 14% vs national group 9%) in the first RMSP classes. Based on these important outcomes being better than or equal to the traditional student cohorts, the institution concluded that the Rural Health Leaders Pipeline demonstrates successful use of the rural pipeline model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 19042679     DOI: 10.1080/10599240801985951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agromedicine        ISSN: 1059-924X            Impact factor:   1.675


  6 in total

1.  Rural family medicine training site: Proposed framework.

Authors:  Sarah Liskowich; Kathryn Walker; Nicolas Beatty; Peter Kapusta; Shari McKay; Vivian R Ramsden
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Predictors of rural family medicine practice in Canada.

Authors:  Goldis Mitra; Margot Gowans; Bruce Wright; Fraser Brenneis; Ian Scott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Student perception about working in rural United States/Canada after graduation: a study in an offshore Caribbean medical school.

Authors:  P Ravi Shankar; Arun K Dubey; Atanu Nandy; Burton L Herz; Brian W Little
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-12-10

Review 4.  The Contribution of Citizens to Community-Based Medical Education in Japan: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ryuichi Ohta; Yoshinori Ryu; Chiaki Sano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Medical education interventions influencing physician distribution into underserved communities: a scoping review.

Authors:  Asiana Elma; Muhammadhasan Nasser; Laurie Yang; Irene Chang; Dorothy Bakker; Lawrence Grierson
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2022-04-07

6.  Effect of Residents-as-Teachers in Rural Community-Based Medical Education on the Learning of Medical Students and Residents: A Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Nozomi Nishikura; Ryuichi Ohta; Chiaki Sano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.