OBJECTIVE: To develop a framework for a successful rural family medicine training program and to assess the potential for a rural family medicine residency training program using the Weyburn and Estevan areas of Saskatchewan as test sites. DESIGN: A mixed-method design was used; however, the focus of this article was on the qualitative data collected. Questions formulated for the semistructured interviews evolved from the literature. SETTING: Rural Saskatchewan. PARTICIPANTS: Community physicians and representatives from the Sun Country Regional Health Authority, the Saskatchewan Ministry of Health, and the University of Saskatchewan. METHODS: The data were documented during the interviews using a laptop computer, and the responses were reviewed with participants at the end of their interviews to ensure accuracy. The qualitative data collected were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. MAIN FINDINGS: Through the analysis of the data several themes emerged related to implementing a rural family medicine residency training program. Key predictors of success were physical resources, physician champions, physician teachers, educational support, administrative support, and other specialist support. Barriers to the development of a rural family medicine training site were differing priorities, lack of human resources, and lack of physical resources. CONCLUSION: A project of this magnitude requires many people at different levels collaborating to be successful.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a framework for a successful rural family medicine training program and to assess the potential for a rural family medicine residency training program using the Weyburn and Estevan areas of Saskatchewan as test sites. DESIGN: A mixed-method design was used; however, the focus of this article was on the qualitative data collected. Questions formulated for the semistructured interviews evolved from the literature. SETTING: Rural Saskatchewan. PARTICIPANTS: Community physicians and representatives from the Sun Country Regional Health Authority, the Saskatchewan Ministry of Health, and the University of Saskatchewan. METHODS: The data were documented during the interviews using a laptop computer, and the responses were reviewed with participants at the end of their interviews to ensure accuracy. The qualitative data collected were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. MAIN FINDINGS: Through the analysis of the data several themes emerged related to implementing a rural family medicine residency training program. Key predictors of success were physical resources, physician champions, physician teachers, educational support, administrative support, and other specialist support. Barriers to the development of a rural family medicine training site were differing priorities, lack of human resources, and lack of physical resources. CONCLUSION: A project of this magnitude requires many people at different levels collaborating to be successful.
Authors: Denis Heng; Raymond W Pong; Benjamin T B Chan; Naushaba Degani; Tom Crichton; James Goertzen; William McCready; Jim Rourke Journal: Can J Rural Med Date: 2007
Authors: Laura H Downey; John R Wheat; James D Leeper; Joseph A Florence; James G Boulger; Matt L Hunsaker Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Benjamin T B Chan; Naushaba Degani; Tom Crichton; Raymond W Pong; James T Rourke; James Goertzen; Bill McCready Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.275