Ruth McLaughlin1, Lisa Nielsen, Michael Waller. 1. Centre for Military and Veterans' Health, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia. ruth.mclaughlin@uq.edu.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: The healthy soldier effect denotes the proposition that military populations are likely to be healthier than other populations. A systematic review was conducted which aimed to quantify the magnitude of the healthy soldier effect. METHODS: Studies containing mortality rates of military personnel were identified from multiple electronic databases. Studies were included in the meta-analyses if they reported all-cause, cancer, or external-cause mortality in a military population and compared the rates to the general population. Fifty-nine studies were initially identified and 12 were included in the meta-analyses. RESULTS: The overall meta-standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for all-cause mortality for deployed veterans was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.89) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.56-1.97) for non-deployed veterans based on a mean follow-up of 7.0 and 2.4 years, respectively; for cancer mortality, the SMRs were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.63-0.98) for deployed veterans and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.50-1.14) for non-deployed veterans based on 6.7 and 3.1 years follow-up, respectively; for external-cause mortality, the SMRs were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.72-1.13) for deployed veterans and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.63-1.01) for non-deployed veterans based on 4.8 and 2.0 years follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: Military personnel do display a healthy soldier effect that decreases their risk of mortality compared to the general population. The overall healthy soldier effect estimated ranges from 10% to 25%, depending on the cause of death studied and the period of follow-up.
PURPOSE: The healthy soldier effect denotes the proposition that military populations are likely to be healthier than other populations. A systematic review was conducted which aimed to quantify the magnitude of the healthy soldier effect. METHODS: Studies containing mortality rates of military personnel were identified from multiple electronic databases. Studies were included in the meta-analyses if they reported all-cause, cancer, or external-cause mortality in a military population and compared the rates to the general population. Fifty-nine studies were initially identified and 12 were included in the meta-analyses. RESULTS: The overall meta-standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for all-cause mortality for deployed veterans was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.89) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.56-1.97) for non-deployed veterans based on a mean follow-up of 7.0 and 2.4 years, respectively; for cancer mortality, the SMRs were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.63-0.98) for deployed veterans and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.50-1.14) for non-deployed veterans based on 6.7 and 3.1 years follow-up, respectively; for external-cause mortality, the SMRs were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.72-1.13) for deployed veterans and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.63-1.01) for non-deployed veterans based on 4.8 and 2.0 years follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: Military personnel do display a healthy soldier effect that decreases their risk of mortality compared to the general population. The overall healthy soldier effect estimated ranges from 10% to 25%, depending on the cause of death studied and the period of follow-up.
Authors: Glyn G Caldwell; Matthew M Zack; Michael T Mumma; Henry Falk; Clark W Heath; John E Till; Heidi Chen; John D Boice Journal: J Radiol Prot Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 1.394
Authors: Julie C Weitlauf; Andrea Z LaCroix; Chloe E Bird; Nancy F Woods; Donna L Washington; Jodie G Katon; Michael J LaMonte; Mary K Goldstein; Shari S Bassuk; Gloria E Sarto; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2015-10-01
Authors: Donna L Washington; Chloe E Bird; Michael J LaMonte; Karen M Goldstein; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Marcia L Stefanick; Nancy F Woods; Lori A Bastian; Margery Gass; Julie C Weitlauf Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2016-02
Authors: Raj G Kumar; Nimali Jayasinghe; Rod L Walker; Laura E Gibbons; Melinda C Power; Eric B Larson; Paul K Crane; Kristen Dams-O'Connor Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-12-05 Impact factor: 4.839