Literature DB >> 19039686

Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.

Ulla Palotie1, Miira M Vehkalahti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations; to assess the possible impacts of dentists' characteristics on these perceptions; and to compare the present longevity estimates with those of recent European reports.
METHODS: A questionnaire to 592 general practitioners, systematically sampled from the Finnish Dental Association's membership list, was posted in April 2004 and data collection was finished by the end of June. The question "In general, what is your estimate for the mean age of restoration in permanent teeth?" pointed restorations: Class II and MOD composites and amalgam in a posterior tooth and Class III composites in an incisor. Dentists' gender, main work, and year of graduation served as background information. Of the 339 (57%) respondents, only public and private dentists were included; 11 were excluded. Three studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for recent reports on restoration longevity. Statistical evaluation was by one-way ANOVA, with p=0.05 as the level of significance.
RESULTS: The mean of the estimates for all types of composite was 9.0 years (SD 3.6; 95% CI 8.6-9.3) and 18.7 years for amalgam (SD 7.3; 95% CI 18.0-19.5). Male dentists gave longer estimates than female dentists for posterior composites, but shorter estimates for amalgam. Compared to public dentists, private dentists gave longer estimates for posterior composites. All estimates were longer than those reported in the recent literature.
CONCLUSION: Dentists' perceptions of posterior composite longevity are significantly longer among males than among females and among private than public sector dentists, and exceed the median longevity reported in recent studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19039686     DOI: 10.1080/00016350802577792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6357            Impact factor:   2.331


  6 in total

1.  Four-year outcomes of restored posterior tooth surfaces-a massive data analysis.

Authors:  Michael Raedel; Andrea Hartmann; Steffen Bohm; Heinz-Werner Priess; Stefanie Samietz; Ioannis Konstantinidis; Michael H Walter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Practitioner, patient and carious lesion characteristics associated with type of restorative material: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Sonia K Makhija; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert; Mark S Litaker; D Brad Rindal; Daniel J Pihlstrom; Vibeke Qvist
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  A prospective 8-year follow-up of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth of children and adolescents in Public Dental Health Service: reasons for replacement.

Authors:  Ulla Pallesen; Jan W V van Dijken; Jette Halken; Anna-Lena Hallonsten; Ruth Höigaard
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Reasons for Placement and Replacement of Resin-based Composite Restorations in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2011-09-05

5.  Placement, replacement and longevity of composite resin-based restorations in permanent teeth in Greece.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Chrysanthakopoulos
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Mathematical methods for assessing the prognostic of fixed partial dentures resulting from evaluating a group of dental patients in Romania.

Authors:  Ioana Chifor; Alexandru I Mitrea; Iulia Clara Badea; Radu Chifor; Mindra Eugenia Badea; Paulina Mitrea; Sever Popa; Maria Crisan; Ramona Avram
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.238

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.