Literature DB >> 19038584

Toxicity and early treatment outcomes in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a monotherapy.

Pirus Ghadjar1, Tamara Keller, Cyrill A Rentsch, Bernhard Isaak, Frank Behrensmeier, Andrea Stroux, George N Thalmann, Daniel M Aebersold.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and present short-term biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-B) monotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between October 2003 and June 2006, 36 patients with low (28) and intermediate (8) risk prostate cancer (PCA) were treated by HDR-B monotherapy. All patients received one implant and four fractions of 9.5Gy within 48h for a total prescribed dose (PD) of 38Gy. Five patients received hormonal therapy (HT). Median age was 63.5 years and median followup was 3 years (range, 0.4-4 years). Toxicity was scored according to the CTCAE version 3.0. Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix criteria.
RESULTS: Acute and late Grade 3 GU toxicity was observed in 1 (3%) and 4 (11%) patients, respectively. Grade 3 GI toxicity was absent. The three- year bNED survival rate was 100%. The sexual preservation rate in patients without HT was 75%. Late Grade 3 GU toxicity was associated with the planning target volume (PTV) V(100) (% PTV receiving > or =100% of the PD; p=0.036), D(90) (dose delivered to 90% of the PTV; p=0.02), and the urethral V(120) (urethral volume receiving > or =120% of the PD; p=0.043). The urethral V(120) was associated with increased PTV V(100) (p<0.001) and D(90) (p=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: After HDR-B monotherapy, late Grade 3 GU toxicity is associated with the urethral V(120) and the V(100) and D(90) of the PTV. Decrease of the irradiated urethral volume may reduce the GU toxicity and potentially improve the therapeutic ratio of this treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19038584     DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2008.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brachytherapy        ISSN: 1538-4721            Impact factor:   2.362


  15 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  A review of rectal toxicity following permanent low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and the potential value of biodegradable rectal spacers.

Authors:  M E Schutzer; P F Orio; M C Biagioli; D A Asher; H Lomas; D Moghanaki
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Use of gold markers for setup in image-guided fractionated high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a monotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pirus Ghadjar; Nicole Gwerder; Axel Madlung; Frank Behrensmeier; George N Thalmann; Roberto Mini; Daniel M Aebersold
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Dosimetric analysis of radiation therapy oncology group 0321: the importance of urethral dose.

Authors:  I-Chow Hsu; Daniel Hunt; William Straube; Jean Pouliot; Adam Cunha; Devan Krishnamurthy; Howard Sandler
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-03-29

5.  High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: are high-risk patients good candidates?

Authors:  Ken Yoshida; Hideya Yamazaki; Tadashi Takenaka; Tadayuki Kotsuma; Mineo Yoshida; Koji Masui; Yasuo Yoshioka; Yoshifumi Narumi; Toshitsugu Oka; Eiichi Tanaka
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  High dose rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for localised prostate cancer: a hypofractionated two-implant approach in 351 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tselis; Ulf W Tunn; Georgios Chatzikonstantinou; Natasa Milickovic; Dimos Baltas; Markus Ratka; Nikolaos Zamboglou
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Influence of zonal dosimetry on prostate brachytherapy outcomes.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Chandana A Reddy; D Allan Wilkinson; Eric A Klein; Jay P Ciezki
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-02-04

Review 8.  The emerging role of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yasuo Yoshioka; Ken Yoshida; Hideya Yamazaki; Norio Nonomura; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 9.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: technique, rationale and perspective.

Authors:  Yasuo Yoshioka; Osamu Suzuki; Yuki Otani; Ken Yoshida; Takayuki Nose; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-04-03

10.  Late toxicity and five year outcomes after high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pirus Ghadjar; Sebastian L Oesch; Cyrill A Rentsch; Bernhard Isaak; Nikola Cihoric; Peter Manser; George N Thalmann; Daniel M Aebersold
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.