Literature DB >> 19037585

Routine coronary angiographic follow-up and subsequent revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Katsunori Shimada1, Hiroshi Kasanuki, Nobuhisa Hagiwara, Hiroshi Ogawa, Naohito Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

The aims of the present study are to: (1) clarify the angiographic follow-up (AFU) rate after discharge; (2) elucidate the characteristics of those undergoing it; and (3) determine the impact of AFU on subsequent revascularization procedures among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Three thousand and twenty-one consecutive patients presenting within 48 h of AMI onset were enrolled from 17 centers in Japan between January 1999 and June 2001. To clarify the frequency of AFU and their characteristics, 2736 patients who survived at discharge were analyzed. Among 1160 patients matched by propensity score, the impact of AFU on subsequent revascularization was analyzed. Of 2736 patients, 1367 (50%) underwent AFU and constituted the lower-risk population. Of the 580 matched patient pairs, 120 (21%) in the clinical follow-up group and 198 (34%) in the AFU group underwent subsequent revascularization (hazard ratio 7.54; 95% confidence interval 5.74-9.91). Of the 198 patients in the AFU group, 157 (79%) underwent revascularization at the discretion of the responsible physician based on angiographic findings. Angiographic follow-up led to more subsequent revascularization. More evidence would be necessary to determine the effectiveness and the methods by which patients are selected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19037585     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-008-1060-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  24 in total

Review 1.  Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Baiju R Shah; Andreas Laupacis; Janet E Hux; Peter C Austin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Determining optimal population rates of cardiac catheterization: a phantom alternative?

Authors:  Madhu K Natarajan; Amiram Gafni; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.

Authors:  Thérèse A Stukel; Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; David A Alter; Daniel J Gottlieb; Marian J Vermeulen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Coronary angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction: which rate is right?

Authors:  J V Tu; C D Naylor; C L Pashos; B J Mcneil
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Induction of thrombolysis and prevention of thrombus formation by local drug delivery with a double-occlusion balloon catheter.

Authors:  T Tomaru; Y Fujimori; F Nakamura; N Aoki; Y Sakamoto; K Kawai; M Omata; Y Uchida
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Utilisation of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction in Ontario over time: have referral patterns changed?

Authors:  Y Khaykin; P C Austin; J V Tu; D A Alter
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Use of coronary angiography and revascularization procedures following acute myocardial infarction. A European perspective.

Authors:  K L Woods; D Ketley; A Agusti; C Hagn; R Kala; N B Karatzas; A Leizorowicz; A Reikvam; J Schilling; R Seabra-Gomes; D Vasiliauskas; L Wilhelmsen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Impact of routine angiographic follow-up after angioplasty.

Authors:  H J Rupprecht; C Espinola-Klein; R Erbel; B Nafe; R Brennecke; U Dietz; J Meyer
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

Authors:  C L Grines; K F Browne; J Marco; D Rothbaum; G W Stone; J O'Keefe; P Overlie; B Donohue; N Chelliah; G C Timmis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Reduced collateral circulation to the infarct-related artery in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Toshiya Kurotobi; Hiroshi Sato; Kunihiro Kinjo; Daisaku Nakatani; Hiroya Mizuno; Masahiko Shimizu; Katsuji Imai; Atsushi Hirayama; Kazuhisa Kodama; Masatsugu Hori
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  3 in total

1.  Data feedback reduces door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jeng-Feng Lin; Shun-Yi Hsu; Semon Wu; Chiau-Suong Liau; Heng-Chia Chang; Chih-Jen Liu; Hsuan-Li Huang; Yao-Tsan Ho; Shu-Li Weng; Yu-Lin Ko
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients.

Authors:  Seonghoon Choi; Hee-Sun Mun; Min-Kyung Kang; Jung Rae Cho; Seong Woo Han; Namho Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.884

3.  Ubiquitous atherosclerosis in coronary arteries without angiographically significant stenosis.

Authors:  Naoki Ishio; Yoshio Kobayashi; Yo Iwata; Hideki Kitahara; Kenichi Fukushima; Tatsuhiko Asano; Takashi Nakayama; Nakabumi Kuroda; Issei Komuro
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.037

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.