Literature DB >> 19036656

The paradox of negative pressure wound therapy--in vitro studies.

Nicolas Kairinos1, Michael Solomons, Donald A Hudson.   

Abstract

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has revolutionised wound care. Yet, it is still not understood how hypobaric tissue pressure accelerates wound healing. There is very little reported on the relevant physics of any substance subjected to suction in this manner. The common assumption is that applying suction to a substance is likely to result in a reduction of pressure in that substance. Although more than 250 research articles have been published on NPWT, there are little data verifying whether suction increases or decreases the pressure of the substance it is applied to. Clarifying this basic question of physics is the first step in understanding the mechanism of action of these dressings. In this study, pressure changes were recorded in soft plasticene and processed meat, using an intracranial tissue pressure microsensor. Circumferential, non-circumferential and cavity NPWT dressings were applied, and pressure changes within the underlying substance were recorded at different suction pressures. Pressures were also measured at 1cm, 2 cm and 3 cm from the NPWT placed in a cavity. In all three types of NPWT dressings, the underlying substance pressure was increased (hyperbaric) as suction pressure increased. Although there was a substantial pressure increase at 1cm, the rise in pressure at the 2-cm and 3-cm intervals was minimal. Substance pressure beneath all types of NPWT dressing is hyperbaric in inanimate substances. Higher suction pressures generate greater substance pressures; however, the increased pressure rapidly dissipates as the distance from the dressing is increased. The findings of this study on inanimate objects suggest that we may need to review our current perception of the physics underlying NPWT dressings. Further research of this type on living tissues is warranted. Copyright (c) 2009 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19036656     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.08.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of bacteria and fungus-binding mesh, foam and gauze as fillers in negative pressure wound therapy--pressure transduction, wound edge contraction, microvascular blood flow and fluid retention.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Richard Ingemansson; Sandra Lindstedt; Lotta Gustafsson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  [Special indications for negative pressure wound therapy in dermatologic surgery].

Authors:  E M Valesky; R Kaufmann; M Meissner
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  The influence of different sizes and types of wound fillers on wound contraction and tissue pressure during negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Nicolas Kairinos; Donald Anthony Hudson; Michael Solomons
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  The influence of different sizes and types of wound fillers on wound contraction and tissue pressure during negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Erik Anesäter; Ola Borgquist; Erik Hedström; Julia Waga; Richard Ingemansson; Malin Malmsjö
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Negative pressure wound therapy in complex cranio-maxillofacial and cervical wounds.

Authors:  Giorgio Novelli; Francesco Daleffe; Gisella Birra; Gabriele Canzi; Fabio Mazzoleni; Pietro Boni; Clara Maino; Carlo Giussani; Davide Sozzi; Alberto Bozzetti
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  ASO Author Reflections: Assessing the Safety and Utility of Wound VAC Temporization of the Sarcoma or Benign Aggressive Tumor Bed Until Final Margins are Achieved.

Authors:  Santiago Lozano-Calderon
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Biomechanical Modeling of the Forces Applied to Closed Incisions During Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  John Loveluck; Tom Copeland; Jason Hill; Allan Hunt; Robin Martin
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2016-07-13

8.  A Role for Postoperative Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Multitissue Hand Injuries.

Authors:  Hyung Sup Shim; Ji Seon Choi; Sang Wha Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Biological effects of a disposable, canisterless negative pressure wound therapy system.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Elizabeth Huddleston; Robin Martin
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-04-02

10.  Effects of negative-pressure wound therapy combinedwith microplasma on treating wounds of ulcer and the expression of heat shock protein 90.

Authors:  Zhihong Li; Qihong Wang; Wenxin Mi; Mei Han; Fei Gao; Guangyan Niu; Yindong Ma
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.