OBJECTIVES: Although rates for first-time and recent mammography screening have increased for women in the US in the past decade, rates for repeat mammography remain low. This study aimed to conduct an analysis of women's mammography experience, to examine the rates of repeat mammography and to identify the significant predictors of repeat mammography within 12 and 18 months of the index mammogram. METHODS: Participants were 397 women obtaining a screening mammogram (i.e. index) at three university-affiliated radiology clinics. Following the index mammogram, women completed the measures assessing demographic background, health history, breast cancer knowledge, risk, and screening history, and aspects of the mammography experience. Eighteen months following the index mammogram, 296 women were contacted via telephone to assess repeat mammography behavior. RESULTS: Factor analysis of a mammography experience survey yielded four major components including satisfaction with clinic services, physical experience, psychological experience, and communication with clinic staff. Twelve-month and 18-month repeat mammography rates were 37 and 68%, respectively. Logistic regression models found lifetime number of mammograms to predict repeat mammography at 12 and 18 months. In addition, the number of clinical breast exams obtained in the past 5 years predicted repeat mammography at 12 months, while having scheduled a mammography appointment predicted repeat mammography at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, strategies to increase mammography adherence include implementing a formal reminder system that prompts patients (e.g. postcard, automated telephone call) to schedule an annual mammogram or training clinic staff to automatically schedule an annual mammogram at the time of the current screening appointment. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVES: Although rates for first-time and recent mammography screening have increased for women in the US in the past decade, rates for repeat mammography remain low. This study aimed to conduct an analysis of women's mammography experience, to examine the rates of repeat mammography and to identify the significant predictors of repeat mammography within 12 and 18 months of the index mammogram. METHODS:Participants were 397 women obtaining a screening mammogram (i.e. index) at three university-affiliated radiology clinics. Following the index mammogram, women completed the measures assessing demographic background, health history, breast cancer knowledge, risk, and screening history, and aspects of the mammography experience. Eighteen months following the index mammogram, 296 women were contacted via telephone to assess repeat mammography behavior. RESULTS: Factor analysis of a mammography experience survey yielded four major components including satisfaction with clinic services, physical experience, psychological experience, and communication with clinic staff. Twelve-month and 18-month repeat mammography rates were 37 and 68%, respectively. Logistic regression models found lifetime number of mammograms to predict repeat mammography at 12 and 18 months. In addition, the number of clinical breast exams obtained in the past 5 years predicted repeat mammography at 12 months, while having scheduled a mammography appointment predicted repeat mammography at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, strategies to increase mammography adherence include implementing a formal reminder system that prompts patients (e.g. postcard, automated telephone call) to schedule an annual mammogram or training clinic staff to automatically schedule an annual mammogram at the time of the current screening appointment. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Terry C Davis; Connie L Arnold; Charles L Bennett; Michael S Wolf; Dachao Liu; Alfred Rademaker Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Karen Donelan; Johanna R Mailhot; David Dutwin; Kristen Barnicle; Sarah Abernethy Oo; Karin Hobrecker; Sanja Percac-Lima; Bruce A Chabner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-07-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Carlene Wilson; Joanne M Osborne; Stephen R Cole; Ingrid Flight; Graeme P Young Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: A Selva; C Selva; Y Álvarez-Pérez; N Torà; P López; R Terraza-Núñez; V Rodríguez; I Solà Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Karin Nielsen; Hester J Scheffer; Indra C Pieters; Aukje A J M van Tilborg; Jan-Hein T M van Waesberghe; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Martijn R Meijerink; Geert Kazemier; Otto S Hoekstra; Hermien W H Schreurs; Colin Sietses; Sybren Meijer; Emile F I Comans; Petrousjka M P van den Tol Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 1.930