Literature DB >> 19035468

Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.

Tricia S Tang1, Stephanie K Patterson, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Linping Duan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although rates for first-time and recent mammography screening have increased for women in the US in the past decade, rates for repeat mammography remain low. This study aimed to conduct an analysis of women's mammography experience, to examine the rates of repeat mammography and to identify the significant predictors of repeat mammography within 12 and 18 months of the index mammogram.
METHODS: Participants were 397 women obtaining a screening mammogram (i.e. index) at three university-affiliated radiology clinics. Following the index mammogram, women completed the measures assessing demographic background, health history, breast cancer knowledge, risk, and screening history, and aspects of the mammography experience. Eighteen months following the index mammogram, 296 women were contacted via telephone to assess repeat mammography behavior.
RESULTS: Factor analysis of a mammography experience survey yielded four major components including satisfaction with clinic services, physical experience, psychological experience, and communication with clinic staff. Twelve-month and 18-month repeat mammography rates were 37 and 68%, respectively. Logistic regression models found lifetime number of mammograms to predict repeat mammography at 12 and 18 months. In addition, the number of clinical breast exams obtained in the past 5 years predicted repeat mammography at 12 months, while having scheduled a mammography appointment predicted repeat mammography at 18 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, strategies to increase mammography adherence include implementing a formal reminder system that prompts patients (e.g. postcard, automated telephone call) to schedule an annual mammogram or training clinic staff to automatically schedule an annual mammogram at the time of the current screening appointment. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19035468     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  11 in total

1.  Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; S Suresh Madhavan; Rahul Khanna; Scot C Remick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Sustaining mammography screening among the medically underserved: a follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  Terry C Davis; Connie L Arnold; Charles L Bennett; Michael S Wolf; Dachao Liu; Alfred Rademaker
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Patient perspectives of clinical care and patient navigation in follow-up of abnormal mammography.

Authors:  Karen Donelan; Johanna R Mailhot; David Dutwin; Kristen Barnicle; Sarah Abernethy Oo; Karin Hobrecker; Sanja Percac-Lima; Bruce A Chabner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Development and validation of an instrument assessing women's satisfaction with screening mammography in an organized breast cancer screening program.

Authors:  Isabelle Bairati; Stéphane Turcotte; Geneviève Doray; France Belleau; Louise Grégoire
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Behavioural and demographic predictors of adherence to three consecutive faecal occult blood test screening opportunities: a population study.

Authors:  Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Carlene Wilson; Joanne M Osborne; Stephen R Cole; Ingrid Flight; Graeme P Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Satisfaction, discomfort, obligations, and concerns in population-based breast cancer screening: cross-sectional study in a Danish population.

Authors:  Pernille Gabel; Mette Bach Larsen; Pernille Bjørnholt Nielsen; Dorte Brandt Svendstrup; Berit Andersen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Psychosocial consequences of false-positive results in screening mammography.

Authors:  Zeina El Hachem; Marouan Zoghbi; Souheil Hallit
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-02

8.  Effects of different reminder strategies on first-time mammography screening among women in Taiwan.

Authors:  Miao-Ling Lin; Joh-Jong Huang; Shu-Hua Li; Fang-Hsin Lee; Ming-Feng Hou; Hsiu-Hung Wang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures.

Authors:  A Selva; C Selva; Y Álvarez-Pérez; N Torà; P López; R Terraza-Núñez; V Rodríguez; I Solà
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  The use of PET-MRI in the follow-up after radiofrequency- and microwave ablation of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Karin Nielsen; Hester J Scheffer; Indra C Pieters; Aukje A J M van Tilborg; Jan-Hein T M van Waesberghe; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Martijn R Meijerink; Geert Kazemier; Otto S Hoekstra; Hermien W H Schreurs; Colin Sietses; Sybren Meijer; Emile F I Comans; Petrousjka M P van den Tol
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.