Literature DB >> 19035463

Time to stop ovarian cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers?

Nienke M van der Velde1, Marian J E Mourits, Henriëtte J G Arts, Jacob de Vries, Beike K Leegte, Grieteke Dijkhuis, Jan C Oosterwijk, Geertruida H de Bock.   

Abstract

Women at high risk of ovarian cancer due to a genetic predisposition may opt for either surveillance or prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (pBSO). Main objective of our study was to determine the effectiveness of ovarian cancer screening in women with a BRCA1/2 mutation. We evaluated 241 consecutive women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who were enrolled in the surveillance program for hereditary ovarian cancer from September 1995 until May 2006 at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), The Netherlands. The ovarian cancer screening included annual pelvic examination, transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and serum CA125 measurement. To evaluate the effectiveness of screening in diagnosing (early stage) ovarian cancer sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of pelvic examination, TVU and CA125 were calculated. Three ovarian cancers were detected during the surveillance period; 1 prevalent cancer, 1 interval cancer and 1 screen-detected cancer, all in an advanced stage (FIGO stage IIIc). A PPV of 20% was achieved for pelvic examination, 33% for TVU and 6% for CA125 estimation alone. The NPV were 99.4% for pelvic examination, 99.5% for TVU and 99.4% for CA125. All detected ovarian cancers were in an advanced stage, and sensitivities and positive predictive values of the screening modalities are low. Restricting the analyses to incident contacts that contained all 3 screening modalities did not substantially change the outcomes. Annual gynecological screening of women with a BRCA1/2 mutation to prevent advanced stage ovarian cancer is not effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19035463     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  29 in total

Review 1.  The role of BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Alison H Trainer; Craig R Lewis; Kathy Tucker; Bettina Meiser; Michael Friedlander; Robyn L Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Microscopic and early-stage ovarian cancers in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: building a model for early BRCA-associated tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Melinda S Yates; Larissa A Meyer; Michael T Deavers; Molly S Daniels; Elizabeth R Keeler; Samuel C Mok; David M Gershenson; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-01-28

3.  S3-Guideline on Diagnostics, Therapy and Follow-up of Malignant Ovarian Tumours: Short version 1.0 - AWMF registration number: 032/035OL, June 2013.

Authors:  U Wagner; P Harter; F Hilpert; S Mahner; A Reuß; A du Bois; E Petru; W Meier; P Ortner; K König; K Lindel; D Grab; P Piso; O Ortmann; I Runnebaum; J Pfisterer; D Lüftner; N Frickhofen; F Grünwald; B O Maier; J Diebold; S Hauptmann; F Kommoss; G Emons; B Radeleff; M Gebhardt; N Arnold; G Calaminus; I Weisse; J Weis; J Sehouli; D Fink; A Burges; A Hasenburg; C Eggert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 4.  Salpingectomy as a means to reduce ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Charles W Dresher; Melinda S Yates; Joanne M Jeter; Beth Y Karlan; David S Alberts; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-01-13

5.  Cancer Genetic Counseling and Testing: Perspectives of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients and Gynecologic Oncology Healthcare Providers.

Authors:  Margaret I Liang; Deanna H Wong; Christine S Walsh; Robin Farias-Eisner; Joshua G Cohen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Before it catches the eye….

Authors:  Marian J Mourits; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 7.  Clinical management of hereditary breast cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Amy S Clark; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening in 1077 women after BRCA testing.

Authors:  Gabriel N Mannis; Julia E Fehniger; Jennifer S Creasman; Vanessa L Jacoby; Mary S Beattie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Accuracy of ovarian and colon cancer risk assessments by U.S. physicians.

Authors:  Laura-Mae Baldwin; Katrina F Trivers; C Holly A Andrilla; Barbara Matthews; Jacqueline W Miller; Denise M Lishner; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  More breast cancer patients prefer BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling.

Authors:  Aisha S Sie; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Liesbeth Spruijt; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Han G Brunner; Judith B Prins; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.