OBJECTIVES: Tamoxifen is a partial ER antagonist that is highly effective in the treatment of receptor positive breast cancer. It significantly reduces recurrence and improves survival in both pre- and postmenopausal women. Unfortunately, many ER+ positive tumors progress despite tamoxifen treatment and until now, no possibility exists to prospectively identify tamoxifen-resistant tumors. It has been suggested that that in HER2 over-expressing tumors, cross-talk via activated HER2 receptors is a key mechanisms by which tumors become tamoxifen-resistant. METHODS: We have therefore used immunohistochemistry to analyze the expression of HER2 and activated ptyr-1248 HER2 in 408 women of ER+, early breast cancer who had received at least 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. We then analyzed possible associations between HER2 and pHER2 expression, and prognostic parameters, and evaluated the effect of HER2 expression and survival. RESULTS: With HER2 being positive in 12 of 208 (2.9%) of ER+ positive tumors, HER2 overexpression was found to be considerably less common in ER+ tumors than what has been thought previously. The majority of HER2 overexpressing tumors, however, also expressed the activated receptor form (r = 0.664; P < 0.0001). Both HER2 and pHER2 are moderately correlated with Grading (r = 0.138; P = 0.0052 and r = 0.118; P = 0.0241, respectively) and nodal involvement (r = 0.163; P = 0.0018 and r = 0.134; P = 0.016, respectively), but neither HER2 nor its activated form are significant predictors of RFS, DFS, or OS. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, we have demonstrated that in ER+ breast cancer, the HER2 receptor is commonly activated, but its low prevalence in ER+ tumors does not render it a useful prognostic parameter in tamoxifen-treated patients.
OBJECTIVES:Tamoxifen is a partial ER antagonist that is highly effective in the treatment of receptor positive breast cancer. It significantly reduces recurrence and improves survival in both pre- and postmenopausal women. Unfortunately, many ER+ positive tumors progress despite tamoxifen treatment and until now, no possibility exists to prospectively identify tamoxifen-resistant tumors. It has been suggested that that in HER2 over-expressing tumors, cross-talk via activated HER2 receptors is a key mechanisms by which tumors become tamoxifen-resistant. METHODS: We have therefore used immunohistochemistry to analyze the expression of HER2 and activated ptyr-1248 HER2 in 408 women of ER+, early breast cancer who had received at least 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. We then analyzed possible associations between HER2 and pHER2 expression, and prognostic parameters, and evaluated the effect of HER2 expression and survival. RESULTS: With HER2 being positive in 12 of 208 (2.9%) of ER+ positive tumors, HER2 overexpression was found to be considerably less common in ER+ tumors than what has been thought previously. The majority of HER2 overexpressing tumors, however, also expressed the activated receptor form (r = 0.664; P < 0.0001). Both HER2 and pHER2 are moderately correlated with Grading (r = 0.138; P = 0.0052 and r = 0.118; P = 0.0241, respectively) and nodal involvement (r = 0.163; P = 0.0018 and r = 0.134; P = 0.016, respectively), but neither HER2 nor its activated form are significant predictors of RFS, DFS, or OS. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, we have demonstrated that in ER+ breast cancer, the HER2 receptor is commonly activated, but its low prevalence in ER+ tumors does not render it a useful prognostic parameter in tamoxifen-treated patients.
Authors: J M Gee; J F Robertson; E Gutteridge; I O Ellis; S E Pinder; M Rubini; R I Nicholson Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: R Zeillinger; F Kury; K Czerwenka; E Kubista; G Sliutz; W Knogler; J Huber; C Zielinski; G Reiner; R Jakesz Journal: Oncogene Date: 1989-01 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: M J Ellis; A Coop; B Singh; L Mauriac; A Llombert-Cussac; F Jänicke; W R Miller; D B Evans; M Dugan; C Brady; E Quebe-Fehling; M Borgs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-09-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D J Slamon; W Godolphin; L A Jones; J A Holt; S G Wong; D E Keith; W J Levin; S G Stuart; J Udove; A Ullrich Journal: Science Date: 1989-05-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: D R Ciocca; F K Fujimura; A K Tandon; G M Clark; C Mark; G J Lee-Chen; G W Pounds; P Vendely; M A Owens; M R Pandian Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1992-08-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Hadi Yaziji; Lynn C Goldstein; Todd S Barry; Robert Werling; Harry Hwang; Georgiana K Ellis; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Allen M Gown Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-04-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Naoki Hayashi; Takayuki Iwamoto; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Jaime Ferrer-Lozano; Ana Lluch; Naoki Niikura; Chandra Bartholomeusz; Seigo Nakamura; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Naoto T Ueno Journal: Oncologist Date: 2011-06-28