Literature DB >> 19034378

Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm.

Melanie Hauck1, Alexander Bauer, Frederik Voss, Hugo A Katus, Ruediger Becker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm (SR) has anecdotally been reported following cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
OBJECTIVE: This monocenter observational study was designed to estimate the incidence of spontaneous conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation to SR in consecutive patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronisation device. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 46 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (> or =4 weeks pre-implant), left bundle branch block (QRS > 130 ms), left ventricular ejection fraction <0.35 and NYHA III or IV heart failure were implanted with a cardiac resynchronisation pacemaker or defibrillator and followed for at least 6 months between 6/2000 to 12/2006. During 22 +/- 9 (7-34) months of follow-up, eight out of 46 patients (17%) converted to SR. Spontaneous conversion was encountered in seven cases, whereas one patient converted due to an ICD shock delivered for ventricular tachycardia; in the latter patient, previous ICD shocks had not converted atrial fibrillation. The time interval from device implantation to conversion was 12 +/- 11 (3-31) months. In patients converting to SR, the duration of atrial fibrillation before device implantation was significantly shorter than in patients remaining in atrial fibrillation (15 +/- 13 vs. 53 +/- 58 months, P = 0.001). Echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left atrial diameter did not differ significantly between converting and non-converting patients. However, patients converting to SR showed a significant reduction in systolic pulmonary artery pressure on CRT vs. before CRT (45 +/- 13 vs. 29 +/- 5 mmHg, P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that CRT favors spontaneous conversion of persistent AF to SR in a minority of patients. If confirmed by larger clinical studies, atrial lead implantation would be encouraged in these patients, in order to provide AV synchronous pacing in case of spontaneous conversion or successful cardioversion to SR on cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034378     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-008-0740-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  18 in total

1.  Comparative effects of permanent biventricular pacing for refractory heart failure in patients with stable sinus rhythm or chronic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  C Leclercq; F Victor; C Alonso; D Pavin; G Revault d'Allones; J Y Bansard; P Mabo; C Daubert
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Comparative effects of permanent biventricular and right-univentricular pacing in heart failure patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  C Leclercq; S Walker; C Linde; J Clementy; A J Marshall; P Ritter; P Djiane; P Mabo; T Levy; F Gadler; C Bailleul; J-C Daubert
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Spontaneous conversion of permanent atrial fibrillation into stable sinus rhythm after 17 months of biventricular pacing.

Authors:  Klaus Malinowski
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Michael R Bristow; Leslie A Saxon; John Boehmer; Steven Krueger; David A Kass; Teresa De Marco; Peter Carson; Lorenzo DiCarlo; David DeMets; Bill G White; Dale W DeVries; Arthur M Feldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Recommendations for chamber quantification.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack Shanewise; Scott Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William Stewart
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-02-02

7.  Long-term improvements in quality of life by biventricular pacing in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the Multisite Stimulation in Cardiomyopathy study (MUSTIC).

Authors:  Cecilia Linde; Frieder Braunschweig; Fredrik Gadler; Christophe Bailleul; Jean-Claude Daubert
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure.

Authors:  John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparison of usefulness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure versus patients with sinus rhythm and heart failure.

Authors:  Peter Paul H M Delnoy; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Henk Oude Luttikhuis; Arif Elvan; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Willem P Beukema; Norbert M van Hemel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS).

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of oxygen uptake efficiency slope as a marker of cardiorespiratory reserve on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Berger; Ralf Harun Zwick; Markus Stuehlinger; Wolfgang Dichtl; Gerhard Poelzl; Michael Edlinger; Otmar Pachinger; Florian Hintringer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Nonpharmacological Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: What Is the Role of Device Therapy?

Authors:  Lucie Riedlbauchová; Václav Durdil; Jakub Honěk; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-04-28

Review 3.  Is cardiac resynchronization therapy an antiarrhythmic therapy for atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paul L Hess; Kevin P Jackson; Vic Hasselblad; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) in atrial fibrillation and acute congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Michael Behnes; Ursula Hoffmann; Siegfried Lang; Christel Weiss; Parviz Ahmad-Nejad; Michael Neumaier; Martin Borggrefe; Martina Brueckmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Baseline vectorcardiography as a predictor of invasively determined acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Schau; Walter Koglek; Josef Brandl; Martin Seifert; Jürgen Meyhöfer; Michael Neuss; Georg Grimm; Robert Bitschnau; Christian Butter
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 5.460

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.