Literature DB >> 19033188

A general framework for multiple testing dependence.

Jeffrey T Leek1, John D Storey.   

Abstract

We develop a general framework for performing large-scale significance testing in the presence of arbitrarily strong dependence. We derive a low-dimensional set of random vectors, called a dependence kernel, that fully captures the dependence structure in an observed high-dimensional dataset. This result shows a surprising reversal of the "curse of dimensionality" in the high-dimensional hypothesis testing setting. We show theoretically that conditioning on a dependence kernel is sufficient to render statistical tests independent regardless of the level of dependence in the observed data. This framework for multiple testing dependence has implications in a variety of common multiple testing problems, such as in gene expression studies, brain imaging, and spatial epidemiology.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19033188      PMCID: PMC2586646          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808709105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  13 in total

1.  Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; N A Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate.

Authors:  Christopher R Genovese; Nicole A Lazar; Thomas Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Genomic control for association studies.

Authors:  B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Detecting activation in fMRI data.

Authors:  K J Worsley
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method.

Authors:  Michael A Newton; Amine Noueiry; Deepayan Sarkar; Paul Ahlquist
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Correlation between gene expression levels and limitations of the empirical bayes methodology for finding differentially expressed genes.

Authors:  Xing Qiu; Lev Klebanov; Andrei Yakovlev
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2005-11-22

9.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  A reanalysis of a published Affymetrix GeneChip control dataset.

Authors:  Alan R Dabney; John D Storey
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  137 in total

1.  Using control genes to correct for unwanted variation in microarray data.

Authors:  Johann A Gagnon-Bartsch; Terence P Speed
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Leek; W Evan Johnson; Hilary S Parker; Andrew E Jaffe; John D Storey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  DNA methylation shows genome-wide association of NFIX, RAPGEF2 and MSRB3 with gestational age at birth.

Authors:  Hwajin Lee; Andrew E Jaffe; Jason I Feinberg; Rakel Tryggvadottir; Shannon Brown; Carolina Montano; Martin J Aryee; Rafael A Irizarry; Julie Herbstman; Frank R Witter; Lynn R Goldman; Andrew P Feinberg; M Daniele Fallin
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Asymptotic conditional singular value decomposition for high-dimensional genomic data.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Leek
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  PROJECTED PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS IN FACTOR MODELS.

Authors:  Jianqing Fan; Yuan Liao; Weichen Wang
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.028

6.  Voxelwise genome-wide association study (vGWAS).

Authors:  Jason L Stein; Xue Hua; Suh Lee; April J Ho; Alex D Leow; Arthur W Toga; Andrew J Saykin; Li Shen; Tatiana Foroud; Nathan Pankratz; Matthew J Huentelman; David W Craig; Jill D Gerber; April N Allen; Jason J Corneveaux; Bryan M Dechairo; Steven G Potkin; Michael W Weiner; Paul Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Sufficient Forecasting Using Factor Models.

Authors:  Jianqing Fan; Lingzhou Xue; Jiawei Yao
Journal:  J Econom       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Principles for the ethical analysis of clinical and translational research.

Authors:  Jonathan A L Gelfond; Elizabeth Heitman; Brad H Pollock; Craig M Klugman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  A new statistic for identifying batch effects in high-throughput genomic data that uses guided principal component analysis.

Authors:  Sarah E Reese; Kellie J Archer; Terry M Therneau; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Celine M Vachon; Mariza de Andrade; Jean-Pierre A Kocher; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Human immunophenotyping via low-variance, low-bias, interpretive regression modeling of small, wide data sets: Application to aging and immune response to influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Tyson H Holmes; Xiao-Song He
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.