Literature DB >> 19031492

Nationwide outcome registrations to improve quality of care in rectal surgery. An initiative of the European Society of Surgical Oncology.

Willem van Gijn1, Michel W J M Wouters, Koen C M J Peeters, Cornelis J H van de Velde.   

Abstract

In recent years there have been significant improvements in rectal cancer treatment. New surgical techniques as well as effective neoadjuvant treatment regimens have contributed to these improvements. Key is to spread these advances towards every rectal cancer patient and to ensure that not only patients who are treated within the framework of clinical trials may benefit from these advancements. Throughout Europe there have been interesting quality programmes that have proved to facilitate the spread of up to date knowledge and skills among medical professionals resulting in improved treatment outcome. Despite these laudable efforts there is still a wide variation in treatment outcome between countries, regions and institutions, which calls for a European audit on cancer treatment outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19031492     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  8 in total

Review 1.  Quality Management and Key Performance Indicators in Oncologic Esophageal Surgery.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Constantin Johannes Ahlbrand; Michael Arras; Elke Maria Schreiber; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Quality of surgical care, local recurrence, and survival in patients with low- and midrectal cancers following multimodal therapy.

Authors:  Ilmo Kellokumpu; Jaana Vironen; Matti Kairaluoma; Ismo Jantunen; Hannu Kautiainen; Kyösti Nuorva
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures.

Authors:  Rana M Higgins; Matthew J Frelich; Matthew E Bosler; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality.

Authors:  Olof Jannasch; Andrej Udelnow; Stefanie Wolff; Hans Lippert; Pawel Mroczkowski
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 5.  Reducing healthcare costs facilitated by surgical auditing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Johannes Arthuur Govaert; Anne Charlotte Madeline van Bommel; Wouter Antonie van Dijk; Nicoline Johanneke van Leersum; Robertus Alexandre Eduard Mattheus Tollenaar; Michael Wilhemus Jacobus Maria Wouters
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Predictors of 30-Day Mortality Among Dutch Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery, 2011-2016.

Authors:  Tom van den Bosch; Anne-Loes K Warps; Michael P M de Nerée Tot Babberich; Christina Stamm; Bart F Geerts; Louis Vermeulen; Michel W J M Wouters; Jan Willem T Dekker; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Pieter J Tanis; Daniël M Miedema
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-04-01

7.  A combined measure of procedural volume and outcome to assess hospital quality of colorectal cancer surgery, a secondary analysis of clinical audit data.

Authors:  Nikki E Kolfschoten; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Michel W J M Wouters; Eric-Hans Eddes; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Theo Stijnen; Job Kievit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The modern anatomical surgical approach to localised rectal cancer.

Authors:  R G Orsini; T Wiggers; M C DeRuiter; P Quirke; R G Beets-Tan; C J van de Velde; H J T Rutten
Journal:  EJC Suppl       Date:  2013-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.