Literature DB >> 19030117

THE RARITY OF DNA PROFILES.

Bruce S Weir1.   

Abstract

It is now widely accepted that forensic DNA profiles are rare, so it was a surprise to some people that different people represented in offender databases are being found to have the same profile. In the first place this is just an illustration of the birthday problem, but a deeper analysis must take into account dependencies among profiles caused by family or population membership.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19030117      PMCID: PMC2585748          DOI: 10.1214/07-AOAS128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  6 in total

1.  When can a DNA profile be regarded as unique?

Authors:  D J Balding
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.124

2.  Testing for kinship in a subdivided population.

Authors:  Wing K Fung; Angel Carracedo; Yue-Qing Hu
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Matching and partially-matching DNA profiles.

Authors:  Bruce S Weir
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.832

4.  Significant genetic correlations among Caucasians at forensic DNA loci.

Authors:  D J Balding; R A Nichols
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  On identification by probability.

Authors:  R V Lenth
Journal:  J Forensic Sci Soc       Date:  1986 May-Jun

Review 6.  Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges.

Authors:  Bruce S Weir; Amy D Anderson; Amanda B Hepler
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 53.242

  6 in total
  12 in total

1.  Estimating F-statistics: A historical view.

Authors:  Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Philos Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.317

2.  On the exact distribution of the numbers of alleles in DNA mixtures.

Authors:  Torben Tvedebrink
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Can simple population genetic models reconcile partial match frequencies observed in large forensic databases?

Authors:  Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Developmental validation of the HomyGene19+14Y System.

Authors:  Weian Du; Ling Chen; Hong Liu; Pingming Qiu; Fayuan Li; Jing Gao; Yu Zhou; Bangchao Wang; Chao Liu
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Population-specific FST values for forensic STR markers: A worldwide survey.

Authors:  John Buckleton; James Curran; Jérôme Goudet; Duncan Taylor; Alexandre Thiery; B S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 6.  Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology.

Authors:  Manfred Kayser; Peter de Knijff
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  The interpretation of lineage markers in forensic DNA testing.

Authors:  J S Buckleton; M Krawczak; B S Weir
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 8.  Drawing inferences about the coancestry coefficient.

Authors:  Suvajit Samanta; Yi-Ju Li; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 9.  Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting F(ST).

Authors:  Kent E Holsinger; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Familial identification: population structure and relationship distinguishability.

Authors:  Rori V Rohlfs; Stephanie Malia Fullerton; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.