OBJECTIVE: To re-examine proposed models of cognitive test performance that concluded separate factor structures were required for people with Alzheimer disease (AD) and older adults without dementia. METHODS: Five models of cognitive test performance were compared using multistep confirmatory factor analysis in 115 individuals with autopsy-confirmed AD and 191 research participants without clinical dementia from longitudinal studies at the Washington University AD Research Center. The models were then cross-validated using independent samples of 323 people with clinically diagnosed dementia of the Alzheimer type and 212 cognitively healthy older adults. RESULTS: After controlling for Alzheimer-specific changes in episodic memory, performance on the battery of tests used here was best represented in people both with and without dementia by a single model of one general factor and three specific factors (verbal memory, visuospatial ability, and working memory). Performance by people with dementia was lower on the general factor than it was by those without dementia. Larger variances associated with the specific factors in the group with dementia indicated greater individual differences in the pattern of cognitive deficits in the stage of AD. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid model of general and specific cognitive domains simplifies cognitive research by allowing direct comparison of normal aging and Alzheimer disease performance. The presence of a general factor maximizes detection of the dementia, whereas the specific factors reveal the heterogeneity of dementia's associated cognitive deficits.
OBJECTIVE: To re-examine proposed models of cognitive test performance that concluded separate factor structures were required for people with Alzheimer disease (AD) and older adults without dementia. METHODS: Five models of cognitive test performance were compared using multistep confirmatory factor analysis in 115 individuals with autopsy-confirmed AD and 191 research participants without clinical dementia from longitudinal studies at the Washington University AD Research Center. The models were then cross-validated using independent samples of 323 people with clinically diagnosed dementia of the Alzheimer type and 212 cognitively healthy older adults. RESULTS: After controlling for Alzheimer-specific changes in episodic memory, performance on the battery of tests used here was best represented in people both with and without dementia by a single model of one general factor and three specific factors (verbal memory, visuospatial ability, and working memory). Performance by people with dementia was lower on the general factor than it was by those without dementia. Larger variances associated with the specific factors in the group with dementia indicated greater individual differences in the pattern of cognitive deficits in the stage of AD. CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid model of general and specific cognitive domains simplifies cognitive research by allowing direct comparison of normal aging and Alzheimer disease performance. The presence of a general factor maximizes detection of the dementia, whereas the specific factors reveal the heterogeneity of dementia's associated cognitive deficits.
Authors: D W McKeel; M J Ball; J L Price; D S Smith; J P Miller; L Berg; J C Morris Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 1993 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Dustin Hammers; Elizabeth Spurgeon; Kelly Ryan; Carol Persad; Judith Heidebrink; Nancy Barbas; Roger Albin; Kirk Frey; David Darby; Bruno Giordani Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Andrei G Vlassenko; Lena McCue; Mateusz S Jasielec; Yi Su; Brian A Gordon; Chengjie Xiong; David M Holtzman; Tammie L S Benzinger; John C Morris; Anne M Fagan Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Kathryn P Riley; Gregory A Jicha; Daron Davis; Erin L Abner; Gregory E Cooper; Nancy Stiles; Charles D Smith; Richard J Kryscio; Peter T Nelson; Linda J Van Eldik; Frederick A Schmitt Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2011 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Meghan B Mitchell; Lynn W Shaughnessy; Steven D Shirk; Frances M Yang; Alireza Atri Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Yoo Young Hoogendam; Albert Hofman; Jos N van der Geest; Aad van der Lugt; Mohammad Arfan Ikram Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Kavon Javaherian; Brianne M Newman; Hua Weng; Jason Hassenstab; Chengjie Xiong; Dean Coble; Anne M Fagan; Tammie Benzinger; John C Morris Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2019 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.703