Literature DB >> 19029399

Mammographic breast density--evidence for genetic correlations with established breast cancer risk factors.

Julie A Douglas1, Marie-Hélène Roy-Gagnon, Chuan Zhou, Braxton D Mitchell, Alan R Shuldiner, Heang-Ping Chan, Mark A Helvie.   

Abstract

Previous twin and family studies indicate that the familial aggregation of breast density is due (in part) to genetic factors. Whether these genetic influences are shared with other breast cancer risk factors, however, is not known. Using standard film-screen mammography, we screened 550 women, including 611 pairs of sisters, from the Old Order Amish population of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. We digitized mammograms and quantified the dense and nondense areas of the breast using a computer-assisted method. Information about other breast cancer risk factors was collected via questionnaires and a physical exam. Using pedigree-based variance component methods, we estimated the genetic contributions to several breast cancer risk factors, including breast density, and evaluated the evidence for shared genetic influences between them. After adjusting for covariates, genetic effects accounted for >33% of the total variance of each risk factor (P < 0.001), including breast density, and the dense and nondense areas of the breast were significantly genetically correlated with parity [genetic correlation (rho(G)) = -0.47; P = 0.013] and age at menarche (rho(G) = -0.38; P = 0.008), respectively. The nondense area of the breast and, in turn, breast density, expressed as a ratio of dense area to total area, were also genetically correlated with most measures of adiposity but in opposite directions (rho(G) > or = 0.75; P < 10(-7) for nondense area). We conclude that the genetic components that influence breast density are not independent of the genetic components that influence other breast cancer risk factors. This shared genetic architecture should be considered in future genetic studies of breast density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19029399      PMCID: PMC2843541          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  33 in total

1.  Diabetes in the Old Order Amish: characterization and heritability analysis of the Amish Family Diabetes Study.

Authors:  W C Hsueh; B D Mitchell; R Aburomia; T Pollin; H Sakul; M Gelder Ehm; B K Michelsen; M J Wagner; P L St Jean; W C Knowler; D K Burns; C J Bell; A R Shuldiner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Anabaptist genealogy database.

Authors:  Richa Agarwala; Leslie G Biesecker; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.908

3.  Pleiotropy and principal components of heritability combine to increase power for association analysis.

Authors:  Lambertus Klei; Diana Luca; B Devlin; Kathryn Roeder
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Genetic analysis of mammographic breast density in adult women: evidence of a gene effect.

Authors:  J S Pankow; C M Vachon; C C Kuni; R A King; D K Arnett; D M Grabrick; S S Rich; V E Anderson; T A Sellers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis.

Authors:  J L Hopper; J D Mathews
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.670

6.  Extensions to pedigree analysis. IV. Covariance components models for multivariate traits.

Authors:  K Lange; M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1983-03

7.  Changes in breast density associated with initiation, discontinuation, and continuing use of hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  C M Rutter; M T Mandelson; M B Laya; D J Seger; S Taplin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-01-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

Authors:  N F Boyd; J W Byng; R A Jong; E K Fishell; L E Little; A B Miller; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; M J Yaffe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  A nested case-control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States).

Authors:  I Kato; C Beinart; A Bleich; S Su; M Kim; P G Toniolo
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status.

Authors:  C Byrne; C Schairer; J Wolfe; N Parekh; M Salane; L A Brinton; R Hoover; R Haile
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  8 in total

1.  Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms.

Authors:  Chuan Zhou; Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Julie A Douglas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dynamic multiple thresholding breast boundary detection algorithm for mammograms.

Authors:  Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Caroline Plowden Daly; Julie A Douglas; Yiheng Zhang; Berkman Sahiner; Jiazheng Shi; Jun Wei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Novel Associations between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Risk-Predicting Mammographic Density Measures.

Authors:  Jennifer Stone; Deborah J Thompson; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Christopher Scott; Rulla M Tamimi; Sara Lindstrom; Peter Kraft; Aditi Hazra; Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Matt Jensen; Julie Cunningham; Janet E Olson; Kristen Purrington; Fergus J Couch; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Ruth M L Warren; Robert N Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paula Smith; Nicholas J Wareham; Sebastian M Jud; Katharina Heusinger; Matthias W Beckmann; Julie A Douglas; Kaanan P Shah; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Loic Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Christy Woolcott; Gertraud Maskarinec; Christopher Haiman; Graham G Giles; Laura Baglietto; Kavitha Krishnan; Melissa C Southey; Carmel Apicella; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Giske Ursin; Grethe I Grenaker Alnaes; Vessela N Kristensen; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Inger Torhild Gram; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Kyriaki Michailidou; Joe Dennis; Jacques Simard; Paul Pharoah; Alison M Dunning; Douglas F Easton; Peter A Fasching; V Shane Pankratz; John L Hopper; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Adiposity Change Over the Life Course and Mammographic Breast Density in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Yunan Han; Catherine S Berkey; Cheryl R Herman; Catherine M Appleton; Aliya Alimujiang; Graham A Colditz; Adetunji T Toriola
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-02-26

5.  A method to prioritize quantitative traits and individuals for sequencing in family-based studies.

Authors:  Kaanan P Shah; Julie A Douglas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Common genetic variation and novel loci associated with volumetric mammographic density.

Authors:  Judith S Brand; Keith Humphreys; Jingmei Li; Robert Karlsson; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Extent and distribution of linkage disequilibrium in the Old Order Amish.

Authors:  Cristopher V Van Hout; Albert M Levin; Evadnie Rampersaud; Haiqing Shen; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Braxton D Mitchell; Alan R Shuldiner; Julie A Douglas
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Aromatase inhibitor-induced modulation of breast density: clinical and genetic effects.

Authors:  N L Henry; H-P Chan; J Dantzer; C P Goswami; L Li; T C Skaar; J M Rae; Z Desta; N Khouri; R Pinsky; S Oesterreich; C Zhou; L Hadjiiski; S Philips; J Robarge; A T Nguyen; A M Storniolo; D A Flockhart; D F Hayes; M A Helvie; V Stearns
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.