Literature DB >> 19028600

Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of different types of dental cement on normal cultured human lymphocytes.

A Bakopoulou1, D Mourelatos, A S Tsiftsoglou, N P Giassin, E Mioglou, P Garefis.   

Abstract

In this study we have investigated the genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of eluates derived from different types of commercially available dental cements, including glass ionomer cements (GICs) (Ketac Cem/3M ESPE and GC Fuji I/GC Corp), resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM-GICs) (RelyX Luting/3M ESPE and Vitrebond/3M ESPE) and dual-cure resin cements (RCs) (Variolink II/ Ivoclar-Vivadent and Panavia F 2.0/Kuraray) on normal cultured human lymphocytes. Lymphocyte primary cultures obtained from blood samples of three healthy donors were exposed to serial dilutions of eluates derived from specimens of each material tested. Metaphases were induced with phytohaemagglutinin, collected after 72h treatment by use of colchicine and stained according to the fluorescence plus giemsa (FPG) procedure. Preparations were scored for sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and chromosomal aberrations (CAs), while the proliferation rate index (PRI) was also calculated. Our results show that eluates derived from the RM-GICs and RCs caused severe genotoxic effects by significantly increasing the frequencies of SCEs and CAs in cultures of peripheral blood lymphocytes and by decreasing the relevant PRI values in a dose-dependent manner, whereas the two GICs caused only minor cytogenetic effects. Eluates of the two RM-GICs (Vitrebond and RelyX) were also very cytotoxic, as the first serial dilutions of both materials caused a complete mitotic arrest in lymphocyte cultures. Overall, the degree of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity caused by dental cements decreased as follows: Viterbond>Rely X>Panavia F 2.0>Variolink II>Ketac Cem=GC Fuji I. These results indicate that different types of dental cement differ extensively in their genotoxic and cytotoxic potential and their ability to affect chromosomal integrity, cell-cycle progression, DNA replication and repair. Although these results cannot be directly extrapolated to the clinical situation, the potential occurrence of adverse effects caused by the RM-GICs and RCs tested in this study should be considered when making a clinical decision about dental cements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19028600     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  11 in total

1.  Human and bovine pulp-derived cell reactions to dental resin cements.

Authors:  Hayriye Esra Ülker; Karl Anton Hiller; Helmut Schweikl; Claudia Seidenader; Abdulkadir Sengun; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The effect of pre-heating on monomer elution from bulk-fill resin composites.

Authors:  Mohammad-Esmaeel Ebrahimi-Chaharom; Leila Safyari; Hossein Safarvand; Elmira Jafari-Navimipour; Parnian Alizadeh-Oskoee; Amir-Ahmad Ajami; Mahdi Abed-Kahnamouei; Mahmoud Bahari
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-09-01

3.  Effect of reduced exposure times on the cytotoxicity of resin luting cements cured by high-power led.

Authors:  Gulfem Ergun; Ferhan Egilmez; Sukran Yilmaz
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Biocompatibility Evaluation of Dental Luting Cements Using Cytokine Released from Human Oral Fibroblasts and Keratinocytes.

Authors:  Jae-Sung Kwon; Yin-Zhu Piao; Sun-A Cho; Song-Yi Yang; Ji Hoon Kim; Susun An; Kwang-Mahn Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Effect of heat treatment on cytotoxicity of self-adhesive resin cements: Cell viability analysis.

Authors:  Celso Afonso Klein-Júnior; Roberto Zimmer; Guilherme Scotta Hentschke; Denise Cantarelli Machado; Rubem Beraldo Dos Santos; Eduardo Galia Reston
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

6.  Hot air stream reduces cytotoxicity of light-cured calcium hydroxide based cements.

Authors:  Celso-Afonso Klein-Junior; Roberto Zimmer; Diana-Lina-Bronca Borghetti; Fernando-Freitas Portella; Flávia-Carolina Abich; Daniel-Rodrigo Marinowic; Keiichi Hosaka; Eduardo-Galia Reston
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-03-01

7.  Cytotoxicity Comparison of Harvard Zinc Phosphate Cement Versus Panavia F2 and Rely X Plus Resin Cements on Rat L929-fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sahabi Mahasti; Mandana Sattari; Elham Romoozi; Alireza Akbar-Zadeh Baghban
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.479

8.  Cytotoxicity testing of temporary luting cements with two- and three-dimensional cultures of bovine dental pulp-derived cells.

Authors:  Hayriye Esra Ülker; Mustafa Ülker; Hasan Önder Gümüş; Muhammet Yalçın; Abdulkadir Şengün
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Evaluation of the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in the buccal epithelial cells of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with three light-cured bonding composites by using micronucleus testing.

Authors:  Ebubekir Toy; Sengul Yuksel; Firat Ozturk; Orhan Hakki Karatas; Muhammet Yalcin
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Degree of Conversion and BisGMA, TEGDMA, UDMA Elution from Flowable Bulk Fill Composites.

Authors:  Edina Lempel; Zsuzsanna Czibulya; Bálint Kovács; József Szalma; Ákos Tóth; Sándor Kunsági-Máté; Zoltán Varga; Katalin Böddi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.