BACKGROUND: Painful chronic pancreatitis with main pancreatic ductal strictures is usually managed with endotherapy with a plastic stent. To date, the role of placement of metallic stents, especially uncovered ones in benign pancreatic ductal stricture, has been unsatisfactory as a result of stent dysfunction related to mucosal hyperplasia. OBJECTIVE: We explored the feasibility and safety of temporary placement of a newly designed, fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) in painful chronic pancreatitis and refractory benign pancreatic ductal strictures. DESIGN: A prospective pilot and feasibility study. SETTING: A tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients with chronic painful pancreatitis of alcoholic (8) or idiopathic (5) etiology. INTERVENTION: ERCP with temporary FCSEMS placement (2 months). Endoscopic removal of FCSEMSs was performed with a snare or rat-tooth forceps. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: End points were feasibility, safety, and morbidity. RESULTS: Successful FCSEMS placement was performed in all enrolled patients. After immediate placement of FCSEMS, 2 patients had mild acute pancreatitis related mainly to the stricture dilation procedure (Soehendra stent retriever or balloon dilation). Complications associated with stent placement included 5 migrations (39%, 1 proximal and 4 distal) and 2 incidents of cholestatic liver dysfunction associated with the compression of the bile duct orifice by expansion of FCSEMSs. In 1 patient with proximal migration, the stent was repositioned by an inflated retrieval balloon. Additional endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy with or without biliary stenting was performed in 2 patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction. There was no occurrence of pancreatic sepsis among any patients. FCSEMSs were removed from 9 of 9 patients without stent migration (100% [9/9] as per protocol, and 69% [9/13] as intention to treat, respectively). Improvement or resolution of the pancreatic ductal strictures was confirmed in all 13 patients on follow-up ERCP (2 months after stent placement), regardless of stent migration. LIMITATIONS: Small patient populations without long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Two-month placement of FCSEMSs in patients with refractory benign pancreatic ductal strictures may be feasible and relatively safe. However, stent migration was not uncommon. A further investigation with ideal stent design may therefore be needed before recommending FCSEMSs as a therapeutic option for refractory benign pancreatic ductal strictures.
BACKGROUND:Painful chronic pancreatitis with main pancreatic ductal strictures is usually managed with endotherapy with a plastic stent. To date, the role of placement of metallic stents, especially uncovered ones in benign pancreatic ductal stricture, has been unsatisfactory as a result of stent dysfunction related to mucosal hyperplasia. OBJECTIVE: We explored the feasibility and safety of temporary placement of a newly designed, fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) in painful chronic pancreatitis and refractory benign pancreatic ductal strictures. DESIGN: A prospective pilot and feasibility study. SETTING: A tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients with chronic painful pancreatitis of alcoholic (8) or idiopathic (5) etiology. INTERVENTION: ERCP with temporary FCSEMS placement (2 months). Endoscopic removal of FCSEMSs was performed with a snare or rat-tooth forceps. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: End points were feasibility, safety, and morbidity. RESULTS: Successful FCSEMS placement was performed in all enrolled patients. After immediate placement of FCSEMS, 2 patients had mild acute pancreatitis related mainly to the stricture dilation procedure (Soehendra stent retriever or balloon dilation). Complications associated with stent placement included 5 migrations (39%, 1 proximal and 4 distal) and 2 incidents of cholestatic liver dysfunction associated with the compression of the bile duct orifice by expansion of FCSEMSs. In 1 patient with proximal migration, the stent was repositioned by an inflated retrieval balloon. Additional endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy with or without biliary stenting was performed in 2 patients with cholestatic liver dysfunction. There was no occurrence of pancreatic sepsis among any patients. FCSEMSs were removed from 9 of 9 patients without stent migration (100% [9/9] as per protocol, and 69% [9/13] as intention to treat, respectively). Improvement or resolution of the pancreatic ductal strictures was confirmed in all 13 patients on follow-up ERCP (2 months after stent placement), regardless of stent migration. LIMITATIONS: Small patient populations without long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Two-month placement of FCSEMSs in patients with refractory benign pancreatic ductal strictures may be feasible and relatively safe. However, stent migration was not uncommon. A further investigation with ideal stent design may therefore be needed before recommending FCSEMSs as a therapeutic option for refractory benign pancreatic ductal strictures.