Literature DB >> 19027565

Comparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract wounds.

John P Berdahl1, Bokkwan Jun, John J DeStafeno, Terry Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To directly compare intraoperative and clinical parameters using a torsional handpiece through microincision and standard clear corneal cataract wounds with appropriately configured tips and sleeves.
SETTING: Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
METHODS: Cataracts in both eyes of 32 patients needing bilateral surgery were extracted using the OZil torsional handpiece. Tips and sleeve selections were optimized for the incision chosen. Right eyes had cataract surgery using a standard method consisting of a 2.8 mm incision with a 0.9 mm tapered 30-degree bevel Kelman configuration tip with a Microsleeve. Left eyes had cataract surgery through a 2.2 mm microincision using a 0.9 mm miniflared 45-degree bevel Kelman configuration tip with an Ultrasleeve. Intraoperative measurements included cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and balanced salt solution use. Clinical measurements included preoperative and 1-day postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT), preoperative and 6-month postoperative endothelial cell count (ECC), and preoperative and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).
RESULTS: Intraoperatively, the microincision (2.2 mm) group had less CDE use than the standard incision (2.8 mm) group (P= .001). Clinical measurements showed less ECC loss at 6 months in the microincision group (P<.05). No difference in CCT or AS-OCT findings was detected between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Phacoemulsification using the OZil torsional handpiece through a microincision with an Ultrasleeve and a 45-degree miniflared tip showed favorable clinical and intraoperative characteristics such as less total energy use and less endothelial cell loss at 6 months. Further studies are warranted to substantiate these preliminary findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19027565     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  8 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of coaxial phacoemulsification with 2.2- and 2.8-mm clear corneal incisions.

Authors:  Harinder Singh Sethi; Komal Saluja; Mayuresh P Naik
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Effect of torsional mode phacoemulsification on cornea in eyes with/without pseudoexfoliation.

Authors:  Süleyman Demircan; Mustafa Atas; Yusufcan Yurtsever
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Comparative clinical study of Whitestar Signature phacoemulsification system with standard and Ellips FX handpieces.

Authors:  Daniele Tognetto; Rossella D'Aloisio; Paolo Cecchini; Marta Di Nicola; Giuseppe Di Martino
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Corneal endothelial morphology and function after torsional and longitudinal ultrasound mode phacoemulsification.

Authors:  László Jr Módis; Eszter Szalai; Zsuzsa Flaskó; Gábor Németh
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

5.  Torsional mode phacoemulsification: effective, safe cataract surgery technique of the future.

Authors:  Ahmed M El-Moatassem Kotb; Mohamed M Gamil
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01

6.  Relationship between endothelial cell loss and microcoaxial phacoemulsification parameters in noncomplicated cataract surgery.

Authors:  Mohamed Ae Soliman Mahdy; Mohamed Z Eid; Mahmoud Abdel-Badei Mohammed; Amr Hafez; Jagdish Bhatia
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-29

7.  Thermal imaging comparison of Signature, Infiniti, and Stellaris phacoemulsification systems.

Authors:  Na Kyung Ryoo; Ji-Won Kwon; Won Ryang Wee; Kevin M Miller; Young Keun Han
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Standard Coaxial Small-Incision Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xingchao Shentu; Xin Zhang; Xiajing Tang; Xiaoning Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.