Literature DB >> 19027562

Thin-flap (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) versus thick-flap laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: case-control analysis.

Dimitri T Azar1, Ramon C Ghanem, Jose de la Cruz, Joelle A Hallak, Takashi Kojima, Faisal M Al-Tobaigy, Sandeep Jain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the refractive and visual outcomes of sub-Bowman keratomileusis (SBK) and thick-flap laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for moderate to high myopia and evaluate the effect of corneal flap thickness on outcomes.
SETTING: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
METHODS: Two studies were performed. In the first study, the refractive and visual outcomes in 33 eyes that had SBK (flap thickness 82 to 120 microm) and 62 eyes that had thick-flap LASIK (flap thickness >or=160) were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were spherical equivalent -4.0 to -10.0 diopters (D), astigmatism 3.0 D or less, and follow-up 3 months or more. In the second study, the influence of flap thickness was evaluated. A case-control matched study (21 pairs) that controlled for residual stromal bed (RSB) thickness was performed.
RESULTS: The mean flap thickness was 110.2 microm+/-9.2 (SD) in the SBK group and 179.2+/-19.5 microm in the thick-flap LASIK group. There were no significant differences in visual outcomes. In the second study with equivalent RSB thickness, case-control matched comparisons between SBK (mean 108.6+/-8.0 microm) and thick-flap LASIK (mean 165.7+/-12.6 microm) showed no differences in preoperative and postoperative refractive and visual outcomes. Comparison of the intended versus achieved correction showed no significant differences between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: Retrospective analyses showed that the safety, efficacy, and predictability of SBK were similar to those of conventional thick-flap LASIK in corneas with equivalent RSB thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19027562      PMCID: PMC2763554          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  28 in total

1.  Estimating residual stromal thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Gerald Flanagan; Perry S Binder
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Clinical feature of unintended thin corneal flap in LASIK: 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Hwan-Eok Yeo; Byung-Joo Song
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-12

3.  Corneal tissue ablation depth and the Munnerlyn formula.

Authors:  Austin W Chang; Alexander C Tsang; Janice E Contreras; Paul D Huynh; Christopher J Calvano; Tracy C Crnic-Rein; Edmond H Thall
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Epithelial ingrowth after laser in situ keratomileusis: clinical features and possible mechanisms.

Authors:  Naoko Asano-Kato; Ikuko Toda; Yoshiko Hori-Komai; Yoji Takano; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 5.  LASIK complications: etiology, management, and prevention.

Authors:  S A Melki; D T Azar
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Evaluation of corneal stromal changes in vivo after laser in situ keratomileusis with confocal microscopy.

Authors:  P J Pisella; O Auzerie; Y Bokobza; C Debbasch; C Baudouin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Jason M Jacobs; Michael J Taravella
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; Buddy Russell; Michael A Ward; Keith P Thompson; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Perry S Binder
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Precision of flap measurements for laser in situ keratomileusis in 4428 eyes.

Authors:  Gerald W Flanagan; Perry S Binder
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  7 in total

1.  Influence of flap thickness on visual and refractive outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with a mechanical keratome.

Authors:  Alok S Bansal; Terrence Doherty; J Bradley Randleman; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Comparisons of morphologic characteristics between thin-flap LASIK and SBK.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Ying-Ping Deng; Lin Wang; Yong-Zhi Huang; Le-Mei Qiu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Comparison of visual acuity of the patients on the first day after sub-Bowman keratomileusis or laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Ting Wu; Ze-Hong Dong; Jie Feng; Yu-Feng Ren; Yu-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Analysis of microkeratome thin flap architecture using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Karolinne Maia Rocha; J Bradley Randleman; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function.

Authors:  Bryndon B Hatch; Majid Moshirfar; Andrew J Ollerton; Shameema Sikder; Mark D Mifflin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-21

6.  Comparison of microkeratome assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis with photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Talal A Althomali
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-29

7.  Changes in central corneal thickness and refractive error after thin-flap laser in situ keratomileusis in Chinese eyes.

Authors:  Ming-Hui Zhao; Qiang Wu; Li-Li Jia; Ping Hu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.