BACKGROUND: Currently available bifunctional chelates (BFCs) for attaching Cu-64 to a targeting molecule are limited by either their radiolabeling conditions or in vivo stability. With the goal of identifying highly effective BFCs, we compared the properties of two novel BFCs, 1-oxa-4,7,10-triazacyclododecane-S-5-(4-nitrobenzyl)-4,7,10-triacetic acid (p-NO(2)-Bn-Oxo) and 3,6,9,15-tetraazabicyclo[9.3.1]pentadeca-1(15),11,13-triene-S-4-(4-nitrobenzyl)-3,6,9-triacetic acid (p-NO(2)-Bn-PCTA), with the commonly used S-2-(4-nitrobenzyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid (p-NO(2)-Bn-DOTA). METHODS: p-NO(2)-Bn-DOTA, p-NO(2)-Bn-Oxo and p-NO(2)-Bn-PCTA were each radiolabeled with Cu-64 under various conditions to assess the reaction kinetics and robustness of the radiolabeling. Stability of each Cu-64 BFC complex was evaluated at low pH and in serum. Small animal positron emission tomography imaging and biodistribution studies in mice were undertaken. RESULTS: p-NO(2)-Bn-Oxo and p-NO(2)-Bn-PCTA possessed superior reaction kinetics compared to p-NO(2)-Bn-DOTA under all radiolabeling conditions; >98% radiochemical yields were achieved in <5 min at room temperature even when using near stoichiometric amounts of BFC. Under nonideal conditions, such as low or high pH, high radiochemical yields were still achievable with the novel BFCs. The radiolabeled compounds were stable in serum and at pH 2 for 48 h. The imaging and biodistribution of the Cu-64-radiolabeled BFCs illustrated differences between the BFCs, including preferential clearance via the kidneys for the p-NO(2)-Bn-PCTA Cu-64 complex. CONCLUSIONS: The novel BFCs facilitated efficient Cu-64 radiolabeling under mild conditions to produce stable complexes at potentially high specific activities. These BFCs may find wide utility in the development of Cu-64-based radiopharmaceuticals.
BACKGROUND: Currently available bifunctional chelates (BFCs) for attaching Cu-64 to a targeting molecule are limited by either their radiolabeling conditions or in vivo stability. With the goal of identifying highly effective BFCs, we compared the properties of two novel BFCs, 1-oxa-4,7,10-triazacyclododecane-S-5-(4-nitrobenzyl)-4,7,10-triacetic acid (p-NO(2)-Bn-Oxo) and 3,6,9,15-tetraazabicyclo[9.3.1]pentadeca-1(15),11,13-triene-S-4-(4-nitrobenzyl)-3,6,9-triacetic acid (p-NO(2)-Bn-PCTA), with the commonly used S-2-(4-nitrobenzyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid (p-NO(2)-Bn-DOTA). METHODS:p-NO(2)-Bn-DOTA, p-NO(2)-Bn-Oxo and p-NO(2)-Bn-PCTA were each radiolabeled with Cu-64 under various conditions to assess the reaction kinetics and robustness of the radiolabeling. Stability of each Cu-64 BFC complex was evaluated at low pH and in serum. Small animal positron emission tomography imaging and biodistribution studies in mice were undertaken. RESULTS:p-NO(2)-Bn-Oxo and p-NO(2)-Bn-PCTA possessed superior reaction kinetics compared to p-NO(2)-Bn-DOTA under all radiolabeling conditions; >98% radiochemical yields were achieved in <5 min at room temperature even when using near stoichiometric amounts of BFC. Under nonideal conditions, such as low or high pH, high radiochemical yields were still achievable with the novel BFCs. The radiolabeled compounds were stable in serum and at pH 2 for 48 h. The imaging and biodistribution of the Cu-64-radiolabeled BFCs illustrated differences between the BFCs, including preferential clearance via the kidneys for the p-NO(2)-Bn-PCTACu-64 complex. CONCLUSIONS: The novel BFCs facilitated efficient Cu-64 radiolabeling under mild conditions to produce stable complexes at potentially high specific activities. These BFCs may find wide utility in the development of Cu-64-based radiopharmaceuticals.
Authors: Maggie S Cooper; Michelle T Ma; Kavitha Sunassee; Karen P Shaw; Jennifer D Williams; Rowena L Paul; Paul S Donnelly; Philip J Blower Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: William M Rockey; Ling Huang; Kyle C Kloepping; Nicholas J Baumhover; Paloma H Giangrande; Michael K Schultz Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2011-05-14 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Cara L Ferreira; Donald T T Yapp; Sarah Crisp; Brent W Sutherland; Sylvia S W Ng; Martin Gleave; Corinne Bensimon; Paul Jurek; Garry E Kiefer Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ana Cláudia Camargo Miranda; Sofia Nascimento Dos Santos; Leonardo Lima Fuscaldi; Luiza Mascarenhas Balieiro; Maria Helena Bellini; Maria Inês Calil Cury Guimarães; Elaine Bortoleti de Araújo Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2021-06-27 Impact factor: 6.321
Authors: Jiyun Shi; Tracy W B Liu; Juan Chen; David Green; David Jaffray; Brian C Wilson; Fan Wang; Gang Zheng Journal: Theranostics Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Mrudula Pullambhatla; Catherine A Foss; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Riccardo Ferdani; Carolyn J Anderson; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 7.446