Literature DB >> 19026016

Cross-sectional area and muscular strength: a brief review.

Eric J Jones1, Phil A Bishop, Amanda K Woods, James M Green.   

Abstract

A brief review is provided on the relationship of strength to muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). It is commonly believed that maximal force and CSA are strongly related. Studies examining varying levels of training status display discordant data suggesting complex relationships between training status, CSA and peak force. It has been reported that trained participants had a significantly larger force to CSA ratio (F/CSA) than untrained males and females. Therefore, it is difficult to attribute all force changes due to training to CSA changes. In general, studies of CSA and strength suggest that sex differences may exist. For example, recreationally trained female weightlifters produced higher F/CSA than males at lower velocities of contraction. Definitive conclusions regarding sex differences, force production and CSA are difficult because of limited studies and equivocal results among these studies. Some studies have also examined the impact of aging on F/CSA. These studies seem to follow the same pattern as studies on sex differences and training status, with data suggesting that F/CSA varies unpredictably across ages and that differences may be attributed to factors other than age alone. In the papers reviewed, the relationship between force and CSA is neither consistent nor simple. Although some of the discrepancies between studies could be attributed to methodological variations, this does not seem likely to explain all differences. The F/CSA relationship seems complex, and future studies are required to elucidate the relationships among key factors in the expression of strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19026016     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200838120-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  27 in total

1.  Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans.

Authors:  T Fukunaga; M Miyatani; M Tachi; M Kouzaki; Y Kawakami; H Kanehisa
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  2001-08

2.  A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young women.

Authors:  P D Chilibeck; A W Calder; D G Sale; C E Webber
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1998

3.  Effects of maximal effort strength training with different loads on dynamic strength, cross-sectional area, load-power and load-velocity relationships.

Authors:  B M Moss; P E Refsnes; A Abildgaard; K Nicolaysen; J Jensen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1997

4.  Interpreting the relation between force and cross-sectional area in human muscle.

Authors:  S A Bruce; S K Phillips; R C Woledge
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Relationships between muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area in male sprinters and endurance runners.

Authors:  R J Maughan; J S Watson; J Weir
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1983

6.  The effect of weight-lifting exercise related to muscle fiber composition and muscle cross-sectional area in humans.

Authors:  B Dons; K Bollerup; F Bonde-Petersen; S Hancke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1979-01-10

7.  Muscle quality. I. Age-associated differences between arm and leg muscle groups.

Authors:  N A Lynch; E J Metter; R S Lindle; J L Fozard; J D Tobin; T A Roy; J L Fleg; B F Hurley
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-01

8.  Voluntary strength and muscle characteristics in untrained men and women and male bodybuilders.

Authors:  D G Sale; J D MacDougall; S E Alway; J R Sutton
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1987-05

9.  Sex difference in muscular strength in equally-trained men and women.

Authors:  P Bishop; K Cureton; M Collins
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  The size and strength of the quadriceps muscles of old and young men.

Authors:  A Young; M Stokes; M Crowe
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  1985-04
View more
  39 in total

1.  Tibialis anterior architecture, strength, and gait in individuals with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Daniel C Bland; Laura A Prosser; Lindsey A Bellini; Katharine E Alter; Diane L Damiano
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Associations Between Lean Mass, Muscle Strength and Power, and Skeletal Size, Density and Strength in Older Men.

Authors:  Didier Chalhoub; Robert Boudreau; Susan Greenspan; Anne B Newman; Joseph Zmuda; Andrew W Frank-Wilson; Nayana Nagaraj; Andrew R Hoffman; Nancy E Lane; Marcia L Stefanick; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Tien Dam; Peggy M Cawthon; Eric S Orwoll; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Leg strength and lean mass symmetry influences kicking performance in Australian football.

Authors:  Nicolas H Hart; Sophia Nimphius; Tania Spiteri; Robert U Newton
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  LOWER LIMB ASYMMETRIES IN RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS ATHLETES.

Authors:  Anderson Simas Frutuoso; Fernando Diefenthaeler; Marco Aurélio Vaz; Cintia de la Rocha Freitas
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-02

Review 5.  An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: update on limb muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  François Maltais; Marc Decramer; Richard Casaburi; Esther Barreiro; Yan Burelle; Richard Debigaré; P N Richard Dekhuijzen; Frits Franssen; Ghislaine Gayan-Ramirez; Joaquim Gea; Harry R Gosker; Rik Gosselink; Maurice Hayot; Sabah N A Hussain; Wim Janssens; Micheal I Polkey; Josep Roca; Didier Saey; Annemie M W J Schols; Martijn A Spruit; Michael Steiner; Tanja Taivassalo; Thierry Troosters; Ioannis Vogiatzis; Peter D Wagner
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Characterizing upper limb muscle volume and strength in older adults: a comparison with young adults.

Authors:  Meghan E Vidt; Melissa Daly; Michael E Miller; Cralen C Davis; Anthony P Marsh; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Adiposity attenuates muscle quality and the adaptive response to resistance exercise in non-obese, healthy adults.

Authors:  M D Peterson; D Liu; H Gordish-Dressman; M J Hubal; E Pistilli; T J Angelopoulos; P M Clarkson; N M Moyna; L S Pescatello; R L Seip; P S Visich; R F Zoeller; P D Thompson; J M Devaney; E P Hoffman; P M Gordon
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  The relationship between sagittal curvature and extensor muscle volume in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Judith R Meakin; Jonathan Fulford; Richard Seymour; Joanne R Welsman; Karen M Knapp
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Comparison of skeletal muscle miRNA and mRNA profiles among three pig breeds.

Authors:  Xinhua Hou; Yalan Yang; Shiyun Zhu; Chaoju Hua; Rong Zhou; Yulian Mu; Zhonglin Tang; Kui Li
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.291

10.  Bone-muscle indices as risk factors for fractures in men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.

Authors:  A K O Wong; P M Cawthon; K W Peters; S R Cummings; C L Gordon; Y Sheu; K Ensrud; M Petit; J M Zmuda; E Orwoll; J Cauley
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.