BACKGROUND: Emerging data have revealed a negative association between adiposity and muscle quality (MQ). There is a lack of research to examine this interaction among young, healthy individuals, and to evaluate the contribution of adiposity to adaptation after resistance exercise (RE). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) on muscle function among non-obese individuals before and after RE. DESIGN: Analyses included 634 non-obese (body mass index <30 kg m(-2)) subjects (253 males, 381 females; age=23.3 ± 5.2 years). SAT and muscle mass (magnetic resonance imaging-derived SAT and biceps muscle volume), isometric and dynamic biceps strength, and MQ (strength/muscle volume), were analyzed at baseline and after 12 weeks of unilateral RE. RESULTS: At baseline, SAT was independently associated with lower MQ for males (β=-0.55; P<0.01) and females (β=-0.45; P<0.01), controlling for body mass and age. Adaptation to RE revealed a significant negative association between SAT and changes for strength capacity (β=-0.13; p=0.03) and MQ (β=-0.14; P<0.01) among males. No attenuation was identified among females. Post-intervention SAT remained a negative predictor of MQ for males and females (β=-0.47; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal that SAT is a negative predictor of MQ among non-obese, healthy adults, and that after 12 weeks of progressive RE this association was not ameliorated. Data suggest that SAT exerts a weak, negative influence on the adaptive response to strength and MQ among males.
BACKGROUND: Emerging data have revealed a negative association between adiposity and muscle quality (MQ). There is a lack of research to examine this interaction among young, healthy individuals, and to evaluate the contribution of adiposity to adaptation after resistance exercise (RE). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) on muscle function among non-obese individuals before and after RE. DESIGN: Analyses included 634 non-obese (body mass index <30 kg m(-2)) subjects (253 males, 381 females; age=23.3 ± 5.2 years). SAT and muscle mass (magnetic resonance imaging-derived SAT and biceps muscle volume), isometric and dynamic biceps strength, and MQ (strength/muscle volume), were analyzed at baseline and after 12 weeks of unilateral RE. RESULTS: At baseline, SAT was independently associated with lower MQ for males (β=-0.55; P<0.01) and females (β=-0.45; P<0.01), controlling for body mass and age. Adaptation to RE revealed a significant negative association between SAT and changes for strength capacity (β=-0.13; p=0.03) and MQ (β=-0.14; P<0.01) among males. No attenuation was identified among females. Post-intervention SAT remained a negative predictor of MQ for males and females (β=-0.47; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal that SAT is a negative predictor of MQ among non-obese, healthy adults, and that after 12 weeks of progressive RE this association was not ameliorated. Data suggest that SAT exerts a weak, negative influence on the adaptive response to strength and MQ among males.
Authors: Matthew J Delmonico; Tamara B Harris; Marjolein Visser; Seok Won Park; Molly B Conroy; Pedro Velasquez-Mieyer; Robert Boudreau; Todd M Manini; Michael Nevitt; Anne B Newman; Bret H Goodpaster Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Peter T Katzmarzyk; George A Bray; Frank L Greenway; William D Johnson; Robert L Newton; Eric Ravussin; Donna H Ryan; Steven R Smith; Claude Bouchard Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Emidio E Pistilli; Joseph M Devaney; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Margaret K Bradbury; Richard L Seip; Paul D Thompson; Theodore J Angelopoulos; Priscilla M Clarkson; Niall M Moyna; Linda S Pescatello; Paul S Visich; Robert F Zoeller; Paul M Gordon; Eric P Hoffman Journal: Cytokine Date: 2008-06-02 Impact factor: 3.861
Authors: Dympna Gallagher; David E Kelley; Jung-Eun Yim; Natasha Spence; Jeanine Albu; Lawrence Boxt; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Stanley Heshka Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Micah J Drummond; Hans C Dreyer; Bart Pennings; Christopher S Fry; Shaheen Dhanani; Edgar L Dillon; Melinda Sheffield-Moore; Elena Volpi; Blake B Rasmussen Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2008-03-06
Authors: A W Frank; J P Farthing; P D Chilibeck; C M Arnold; W P Olszynski; S A Kontulainen Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: A W Frank-Wilson; J P Farthing; P D Chilibeck; C M Arnold; K S Davison; W P Olszynski; S A Kontulainen Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Ann Zenobia Moore; Giorgio Caturegli; E Jeffrey Metter; Sokratis Makrogiannis; Susan M Resnick; Tamara B Harris; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Barbara J Nicklas; Elizabeth Chmelo; Osvaldo Delbono; J Jeffrey Carr; Mary F Lyles; Anthony P Marsh Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Mark D Peterson; Paul M Gordon; Edward A Hurvitz; Charles F Burant Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 4.310