Literature DB >> 19025895

Functional MRI with magnetization transfer effects: determination of BOLD and arterial blood volume changes.

Tae Kim1, Kristy Hendrich, Seong-Gi Kim.   

Abstract

The primarily intravascular magnetization transfer (MT)-independent changes in functional MRI (fMRI) can be separated from MT-dependent changes. This intravascular component is dominated by an arterial blood volume change (DeltaCBV(a)) term whenever venous contributions are minimized. Stimulation-induced DeltaCBV(a) can therefore be measured by a fit of signal changes to MT ratio. MT-varied fMRI data were acquired in 13 isoflurane-anesthetized rats during forepaw stimulation at 9.4T to simultaneously measure blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) and DeltaCBV(a) response in somatosensory cortical regions. Transverse relaxation rate change (DeltaR(2)) without MT was -0.43 +/- 0.15 s(-1), and MT ratio decreased during stimulation. DeltaCBV(a) was 0.46 +/- 0.15 ml/100 g, which agrees with our previously-presented MT-varied arterial-spin-labeled data (0.42 +/- 0.18 ml/100 g) in the same animals and also correlates with DeltaR(2) without MT. Simulations show that DeltaCBV(a) quantification errors due to potential venous contributions are small for our conditions. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19025895      PMCID: PMC2597018          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  17 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted spin-echo fMRI at 9.4 T: microvascular/tissue contribution to BOLD signal changes.

Authors:  S P Lee; A C Silva; K Ugurbil; S G Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Why does MTR change with neuronal depolarization?

Authors:  Greg J Stanisz; Richard S Yoon; Michael L G Joy; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Tissue specificity of low-field-strength magnetization transfer contrast imaging.

Authors:  P T Niemi; M E Komu; S K Koskinen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Magnetization transfer time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  G B Pike; B S Hu; G H Glover; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Source of nonlinearity in echo-time-dependent BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Ping Wang; Michelle Tasker; Fuqiang Zhao; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Magnetization transfer contrast in MR imaging of the heart.

Authors:  R S Balaban; S Chesnick; K Hedges; F Samaha; F W Heineman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Relationship between neural, vascular, and BOLD signals in isoflurane-anesthetized rat somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Kazuto Masamoto; Tae Kim; Mitsuhiro Fukuda; Ping Wang; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  What is the correct value for the brain--blood partition coefficient for water?

Authors:  P Herscovitch; M E Raichle
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo.

Authors:  S D Wolff; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Noninvasive measurement of arterial cerebral blood volume using Look-Locker EPI and arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  M J Brookes; P G Morris; P A Gowland; S T Francis
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.737

View more
  16 in total

1.  Contributions of dynamic venous blood volume versus oxygenation level changes to BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Zong; Tae Kim; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Biophysical and physiological origins of blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI signals.

Authors:  Seong-Gi Kim; Seiji Ogawa
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Temporal dynamics and spatial specificity of arterial and venous blood volume changes during visual stimulation: implication for BOLD quantification.

Authors:  Tae Kim; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response to brief neural activity in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Kim; Amanda J Taylor; Danny Jj Wang; Xiaowei Zou; David Ress
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Layer-dependent BOLD and CBV-weighted fMRI responses in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Alexander John Poplawsky; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Regional cerebral blood flow and arterial blood volume and their reactivity to hypercapnia in hypertensive and normotensive rats.

Authors:  Tae Kim; J Richard Jennings; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Inflow-based vascular-space-occupancy (iVASO) MRI.

Authors:  Jun Hua; Qin Qin; Manus J Donahue; Jinyuan Zhou; James J Pekar; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Cerebral blood volume MRI with intravascular superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Seong-Gi Kim; Noam Harel; Tao Jin; Tae Kim; Phil Lee; Fuqiang Zhao
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 9.  Noninvasive functional imaging of cerebral blood volume with vascular-space-occupancy (VASO) MRI.

Authors:  Hanzhang Lu; Jun Hua; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 10.  MRI techniques to measure arterial and venous cerebral blood volume.

Authors:  Jun Hua; Peiying Liu; Tae Kim; Manus Donahue; Swati Rane; J Jean Chen; Qin Qin; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.