Literature DB >> 19025828

The New Zealand intensive medicines monitoring programme in pro-active safety surveillance.

D M Coulter1.   

Abstract

Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the pro-active nature of the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme (IMMP) and make an assessment of its effectiveness in postmarketing drug safety evaluation.Methods-The IMMP undertakes prospective observational cohort studies of selected new drugs. Patient cohorts are established from prescription data received from dispensing pharmacists nationwide. Adverse events are reported by doctors on prescription follow-up questionnaires or as spontaneous reports. The method of signal generation is reviewed with particular emphasis on the review of individual event reports and their relationship to the medicine. Signals reported over the last 10 years are assessed for timeliness in advising the regulatory authority.Results-Mean cohort size is 10,964 patients and the mean study period for each drug was 58 months. A total of 153 signals were recorded from 11 drugs with 132 (86%) being notified to the regulatory authority prior to any publication in the literature. The use of 'incidents' in controlling for reporting bias is illustrated and examples are given of data on safety in pregnancy and lactation, the assessment of deaths, reassurance with drug scares, risk comparison and signal validation studies.Conclusion-PEM type methodology is effective and cost-efficient in pro-active safety surveillance even with limited resources. Copyright (c) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 19025828     DOI: 10.1002/1099-1557(200007/08)9:4<273::AID-PDS512>3.0.CO;2-T

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  17 in total

1.  Adverse drug reaction reporting controversy.

Authors:  W C Appel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Signal generation in the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme: a combined clinical and statistical approach.

Authors:  David M Coulter
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  The art and science of risk management: a US research-based industry perspective.

Authors:  Janice K Bush; Wanju S Dai; Gretchen S Dieck; Linda S Hostelley; Thomas Hassall
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Pulmonary vasculitis.

Authors:  Kevin K Brown
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2006

5.  Randomized controlled trials and assessment of drug safety.

Authors:  David W J Clark; David M Coulter; Frank M C Besag
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Defining 'signal' and its subtypes in pharmacovigilance based on a systematic review of previous definitions.

Authors:  Manfred Hauben; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Detection of adverse drug events and other treatment outcomes using an electronic prescribing system.

Authors:  Tewodros Eguale; Robyn Tamblyn; Nancy Winslade; David Buckeridge
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Defining 'surveillance' in drug safety.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson; Manfred Hauben; Andrew Bate
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  The hope, hype and reality of Big Data for pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Andrew Bate; Robert F Reynolds; Patrick Caubel
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-10-31

10.  QT interval prolongation associated with sibutramine treatment.

Authors:  Mira Harrison-Woolrych; David W J Clark; Geraldine R Hill; Mark I Rees; Jonathan R Skinner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.