Literature DB >> 19024658

Enhanced use of backup pathways of NHEJ in G2 in Chinese hamster mutant cells with defects in the classical pathway of NHEJ.

Wenqi Wu1, Minli Wang, Tamara Mussfeldt, George Iliakis.   

Abstract

In higher eukaryotes DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by homologous recombination repair (HRR) or nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). In addition to the DNA-PK dependent pathway of NHEJ (D-NHEJ), cells employ a backup pathway (B-NHEJ) using DNA ligase III and PARP1. We have reported previously that mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) defective in D-NHEJ show enhanced repair of DSBs in G2 not reflecting a contribution of HRR. Here we extend these studies to Chinese hamster mutant cells with defects in the DNA-PKcs, Ku80 or XRCC4 components of D-NHEJ or in the XRCC2 and XRCC3 components of HRR. Using cell sorting to separate cells at defined times after irradiation, we measure repair of DSBs with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in unperturbed G1- and G2-phase cells. Wild-type cells and mutants of XRCC2 and XRCC3 repair DSBs with similar efficiency in G1 and G2. Mutants of DNA-PKcs, Ku80 and XRCC4 show more pronounced repair in G2 than in G1. These and previously published results provide support for the notion that the increased efficacy of DSB repair in G2 reflects the enhanced function of B-NHEJ, which may be a general feature of rodent cells that also holds for human cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19024658     DOI: 10.1667/rr1456.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  11 in total

1.  Progression of chromosomal damage induced by etoposide in G2 phase in a DNA-PKcs-deficient context.

Authors:  Micaela Palmitelli; Marcelo de Campos-Nebel; Marcela González-Cid
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Deregulated BCL-2 family proteins impact on repair of DNA double-strand breaks and are targets to overcome radioresistance in lung cancer.

Authors:  Sarah A Wieczorek; Frank Breitenbuecher; Aashish Soni; Katja Paul-Konietzko; Sophie Ziegler; Ali Sak; George Iliakis; Martin Schuler
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Error-prone nonhomologous end joining repair operates in human pluripotent stem cells during late G2.

Authors:  Alexandra N Bogomazova; Maria A Lagarkova; Leyla V Tskhovrebova; Maria V Shutova; Sergey L Kiselev
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Post-irradiation chemical processing of DNA damage generates double-strand breaks in cells already engaged in repair.

Authors:  Satyendra K Singh; Minli Wang; Christian Staudt; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  DNA double-strand-break complexity levels and their possible contributions to the probability for error-prone processing and repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Agnes Schipler; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Processing of DNA double strand breaks by alternative non-homologous end-joining in hyperacetylated chromatin.

Authors:  Vasilissa Manova; Satyendra K Singh; George Iliakis
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2012-08-22

7.  DNA ligases I and III cooperate in alternative non-homologous end-joining in vertebrates.

Authors:  Katja Paul; Minli Wang; Emil Mladenov; Alena Bencsik-Theilen; Theresa Bednar; Wenqi Wu; Hiroshi Arakawa; George Iliakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Requirement for Parp-1 and DNA ligases 1 or 3 but not of Xrcc1 in chromosomal translocation formation by backup end joining.

Authors:  Aashish Soni; Maria Siemann; Martha Grabos; Tamara Murmann; Gabriel E Pantelias; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  DNA double-strand break repair in Penaeus monodon is predominantly dependent on homologous recombination.

Authors:  Shikha Srivastava; Sumedha Dahal; Sharanya J Naidu; Deepika Anand; Vidya Gopalakrishnan; Rajendran Kooloth Valappil; Sathees C Raghavan
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Strong suppression of gene conversion with increasing DNA double-strand break load delimited by 53BP1 and RAD52.

Authors:  Emil Mladenov; Christian Staudt; Aashish Soni; Tamara Murmann-Konda; Maria Siemann-Loekes; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.