Literature DB >> 19022550

The effect of socioeconomic status on survival from colorectal cancer in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study.

Helen L Kelsall1, Laura Baglietto, David Muller, Andrew M Haydon, Dallas R English, Graham G Giles.   

Abstract

Previous research relating lower socioeconomic status (SES) with poorer survival from colorectal cancer has varied in adjustment for confounding factors and in the use of individual-level or aggregate-level indicators of SES. We investigated the effect of SES and country of birth on survival from colorectal cancers diagnosed in participants of the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. A total of 526 colorectal cancer cases diagnosed since baseline were followed from diagnosis to 1 June 2006 or death. Information on tumour site and stage, and treatments given were obtained from systematic medical record review. SES at diagnosis was assigned using both an area-based measure of social disadvantage and individual level of educational attainment. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios associated with socioeconomic disadvantage, educational attainment, and country of birth. During an average follow-up of 5.6 years from diagnosis, 230 deaths occurred, 197 from colorectal cancer. After adjusting for age, sex, tumour stage, waist circumference and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the hazard ratios of dying from all causes and from colorectal cancer associated with living in the least disadvantaged areas compared with most disadvantaged areas were 0.73 (95% CI 0.53-1.00, p for trend=0.06) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.57-1.12, p for trend=0.22) respectively. Further adjustment for hospital case-load, tumour characteristics, and lifestyle factors did not change the estimates materially. Level of educational attainment and country of birth were not independent predictors of the risk of dying from colorectal cancer. Despite a universal health care system in Australia, socioeconomic inequalities in survival from colorectal cancer exist, and an enduring challenge is to ensure that improvements in colorectal cancer survival are shared equally across the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19022550     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  17 in total

1.  Geographic variation in colorectal cancer survival and the role of small-area socioeconomic deprivation: a multilevel survival analysis of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort.

Authors:  Min Lian; Mario Schootman; Chyke A Doubeni; Yikyung Park; Jacqueline M Major; Rosalie A Torres Stone; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Albert R Hollenbeck; Barry I Graubard; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Research in cancer care disparities in countries with universal healthcare: mapping the field and its conceptual contours.

Authors:  Christina Sinding; Rachel Warren; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Jonathan Sussman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Social Disadvantage, Healthcare Utilization, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Leveraging Longitudinal Patient Address and Health Records Data.

Authors:  Amy E Hughes; Jasmin A Tiro; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Celette Sugg Skinner; Sandi L Pruitt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Socioeconomic status and gastric cancer survival in Japan.

Authors:  Aya Kuwahara; Ribeka Takachi; Yoshitaka Tsubono; Shizuka Sasazuki; Manami Inoue; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  A clinical risk score to predict 3-, 5- and 10-year survival in patients undergoing surgery for Dukes B colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D C McMillan; C S McArdle; D S Morrison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Uncontrolled confounding in studies of screening effectiveness: an example of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ronald C Eldridge; Chyke A Doubeni; Robert H Fletcher; Ann G Zauber; Douglas A Corley; V Paul Doria-Rose; Michael Goodman
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  Geographic remoteness and risk of advanced colorectal cancer at diagnosis in Queensland: a multilevel study.

Authors:  P D Baade; P Dasgupta; J Aitken; G Turrell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Colorectal cancer mortality among Hispanics in California: differences by neighborhood socioeconomic status and nativity.

Authors:  Li Tao; Uri Ladabaum; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Iona Cheng
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 9.  Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Association Between Molecular Subtypes of Colorectal Tumors and Patient Survival, Based on Pooled Analysis of 7 International Studies.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Elizabeth Alwers; Tabitha Harrison; Barbara Banbury; Hermann Brenner; Peter T Campbell; Jenny Chang-Claude; Daniel Buchanan; Andrew T Chan; Alton B Farris; Jane C Figueiredo; Steven Gallinger; Graham G Giles; Mark Jenkins; Roger L Milne; Polly A Newcomb; Martha L Slattery; Mingyang Song; Shuji Ogino; Syed H Zaidi; Michael Hoffmeister; Ulrike Peters
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.