Literature DB >> 19022435

Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients.

Pierre Panel1, Isabelle Grosdemouge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess a new hysteroscopic method of tubal sterilization; specifically, to examine the factors associated with placement failure of Essure implants.
DESIGN: Observational, multicenter, 6-month study.
SETTING: Seven gynecology clinics, including five public hospitals and two private clinics, in France. PATIENT(S): A total of 495 women who provided informed consent. INTERVENTION(S): All procedures were done by a vaginoscopic approach with a 5-mm operating hysteroscope. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Data collected were age, parity, type of anesthesia, premedication, endometrial aspect, ostia visualization, duration of the procedure, pain during the procedure, and associated procedures. Unilateral and bilateral placement rates were assessed. Adverse events at 3 months (expulsion, migration, perforation) were also recorded. RESULT(S): Mean parity was 2.45; 20 women were nulliparous. In 56.3% of cases (n = 277), none or local anesthesia was used for the placement procedure. Overall, 86% of the women (n = 423) had nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) premedication, and 8.1% (n = 40) had another intrauterine surgical procedure performed at the same time. In 24 cases, at least one of the tubal ostia could not be visualized well during hysteroscopy. CONCLUSION(S): The failure rate for Essure micro-insert placement was 6% at first attempt and 3.3% after two attempts. Success rate was not significantly associated with parity, mode of analgesia, NSAID premedication, or combination with another procedure. The only factor significantly associated with the failure rate was poor visualization of the tubal ostia. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19022435     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training.

Authors:  Pierre Panel; Michael Bajka; Arnaud Le Tohic; Alaa El Ghoneimi; Carmen Chis; Stéphane Cotin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Incidence of opioid-managed pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization versus laparoscopic sterilization, US 2005-2012.

Authors:  Mitchell M Conover; Jennifer O Howell; Jennifer M Wu; Alan C Kinlaw; Nabarun Dasgupta; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 3.  Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; Regina Kulier; Juan Manuel Nardin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-05

4.  Tubal risk markers for failure to place transcervical sterilization coils.

Authors:  Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahta Rouhani; Mahbubur Rahman; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 5.  A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt.

Authors:  Gabriel Frietze; Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahbubur Rahman; Mahta Rouhani; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-12-01

6.  Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure.

Authors:  Collette R Lessard; Matthew R Hopkins
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Essure Surgical Removal and Subsequent Resolution of Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Isamarie Lora Alcantara; Shadi Rezai; Catherine Kirby; Annika Chadee; Cassandra E Henderson; Malvina Elmadjian
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-01-24

8.  Discussion on operative skills in the embolization of hydrosalpinx by hysteroscopic placement of a microcoil.

Authors:  Hua-Lei Cai; Le-Yun Pan; Shun-Fang Wang; Yu Tian; Xiao-Zhu Zheng; Yan Yang; Kun Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Increasing Patient Engagement in Pharmacovigilance Through Online Community Outreach and Mobile Reporting Applications: An Analysis of Adverse Event Reporting for the Essure Device in the US.

Authors:  Chi Y Bahk; Melanie Goshgarian; Krystal Donahue; Clark C Freifeld; Christopher M Menone; Carrie E Pierce; Harold Rodriguez; John S Brownstein; Robert Furberg; Nabarun Dasgupta
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2015-08-05

10.  Factors Associated with Negative Patient Experiences with Essure Sterilization.

Authors:  Emilie V J van Limburg Stirum; Nisse V Clark; Alexis Lindsey; Xiangmei Gu; Andreas L Thurkow; Jon I Einarsson; Sarah L Cohen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.