Literature DB >> 19021976

Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction.

Ramdas G Pai1, Padmini Varadarajan, Anees Razzouk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is becoming increasingly common with the aging population. Many of these patients have reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions (EF) or low transvalvular gradients resulting in reluctance to offer aortic valve replacement (AVR).
METHODS: Our echocardiographic database for the period of 1993 to 2003 was screened for severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] </= 0.8 cm(2)) with LVEF 0.35 or less or a mean transvalvular gradient of 30 mm Hg or less. Chart reviews were performed for clinical, pharmacologic, and surgical details. Survival data were obtained from the Social Security Death Index and analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression, sensitivity, and propensity score analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 740 patients with severe AS, 194 (26%) had severe LV dysfunction defined as EF 0.35 or less and 168 (23%) a mean transvalvular gradient of 30 mm Hg or less. Low ejection fraction was not a prerequisite for a low gradient. The Univariate predictors of higher mortality in both groups included higher age, lower ejection fraction, renal insufficiency, and lack of aortic valve replacement. Lack of aortic valve replacement was a strong predictor of mortality after adjusting for 18 clinical, echocardiographic, and pharmacologic variables. There were 72 patients with EF 0.20 or less, of whom 18 had AVR, which was associated with a large survival benefit similar to the entire cohort. In the 52 patients with EF 0.55 or less and mean gradient less than 30 mm Hg, the 5-year survival with AVR was 90% compared with 20% without AVR (p < 0.0001) which was supported by propensity score analysis as well.
CONCLUSIONS: Severe LV dysfunction or a low transvalvular gradient is seen in about a quarter of patients with severe AS and there is a reluctance to offer AVR in these patients. Aortic valve replacement is associated with a large mortality benefit in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19021976     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  26 in total

1.  The utility of computed tomography in the context of aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Gudrun M Feuchtner
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis: an update--including low-flow States, myocardial mechanics, and stress testing.

Authors:  Luc A Pierard; Raluca Dulgheru
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Invasive hemodynamic assessments during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: comparison of patient outcomes in higher vs. lower transvalvular gradients with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Jury Schewel; Dimitry Schewel; Christian Frerker; Peter Wohlmuth; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Impact of left ventricular conduction defect with or without need for permanent right ventricular pacing on functional and clinical recovery after TAVR.

Authors:  Marcel Weber; Eva Brüggemann; Robert Schueler; Diana Momcilovic; Jan-Malte Sinning; Alexander Ghanem; Nikos Werner; Eberhard Grube; Wolfgang Schiller; Fritz Mellert; Armin Welz; Georg Nickenig; Christoph Hammerstingl
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis-Still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Anja Vogelgesang; Gerd Hasenfuss; Claudius Jacobshagen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 6.  The role of echocardiography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Toshinari Onishi; Kaoruko Sengoku; Yasuhiro Ichibori; Isamu Mizote; Koichi Maeda; Toru Kuratani; Yoshiki Sawa; Yasushi Sakata
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-02

7.  Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction: watchful waiting or valve replacement?

Authors:  Larry E Miller; Valerie M Miller; Larry D Acers
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-04-11

Review 8.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Impact of Ejection Fraction and Aortic Valve Gradient on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Suzanne J Baron; Suzanne V Arnold; Howard C Herrmann; David R Holmes; Wilson Y Szeto; Keith B Allen; Adnan K Chhatriwalla; Sreekaanth Vemulapali; Sean O'Brien; Dadi Dai; David J Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot; Blase Carabello
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.