Literature DB >> 19021779

Ecological modules and roles of species in heathland plant-insect flower visitor networks.

Yoko L Dupont1, Jens M Olesen.   

Abstract

1. Co-existing plants and flower-visiting animals often form complex interaction networks. A long-standing question in ecology and evolutionary biology is how to detect nonrandom subsets (compartments, blocks, modules) of strongly interacting species within such networks. Here we use a network analytical approach to (i) detect modularity in pollination networks, (ii) investigate species composition of modules, and (iii) assess the stability of modules across sites. 2. Interactions between entomophilous plants and their flower-visitors were recorded throughout the flowering season at three heathland sites in Denmark, separated by >or= 10 km. Among sites, plant communities were similar, but composition of flower-visiting insect faunas differed. Visitation frequencies of visitor species were recorded as a measure of insect abundance. 3. Qualitative (presence-absence) interaction networks were tested for modularity. Modules were identified, and species classified into topological roles (peripherals, connectors, or hubs) using 'functional cartography by simulated annealing', a method recently developed by Guimerà & Amaral (2005a). 4. All networks were significantly modular. Each module consisted of 1-6 plant species and 18-54 insect species. Interactions aggregated around one or two hub plant species, which were largely identical at the three study sites. 5. Insect species were categorized in taxonomic groups, mostly at the level of orders. When weighted by visitation frequency, each module was dominated by one or few insect groups. This pattern was consistent across sites. 6. Our study adds support to the conclusion that certain plant species and flower-visitor groups are nonrandomly and repeatedly associated. Within a network, these strongly interacting subgroups of species may exert reciprocal selection pressures on each other. Thus, modules may be candidates for the long-sought key units of co-evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19021779     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01501.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  18 in total

1.  Consequences of plant invasions on compartmentalization and species' roles in plant-pollinator networks.

Authors:  Matthias Albrecht; Benigno Padrón; Ignasi Bartomeus; Anna Traveset
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Inferring species roles in metacommunity structure from species co-occurrence networks.

Authors:  Ana I Borthagaray; Matías Arim; Pablo A Marquet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The influence of floral traits on specialization and modularity of plant-pollinator networks in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes.

Authors:  Stella Watts; Carsten F Dormann; Ana M Martín González; Jeff Ollerton
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Plant sex affects the structure of plant-pollinator networks in a subtropical forest.

Authors:  Minhua Zhang; Fangliang He
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Estimating comparable distances to tipping points across mutualistic systems by scaled recovery rates.

Authors:  Huixin Zhang; Qi Wang; Weidong Zhang; Shlomo Havlin; Jianxi Gao
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 19.100

6.  The whereabouts of flower visitors: contrasting land-use preferences revealed by a country-wide survey based on citizen science.

Authors:  Nicolas Deguines; Romain Julliard; Mathieu de Flores; Colin Fontaine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluating the spatio-temporal factors that structure network parameters of plant-herbivore interactions.

Authors:  Antonio López-Carretero; Cecilia Díaz-Castelazo; Karina Boege; Víctor Rico-Gray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Where are the parasites in food webs?

Authors:  Michael V K Sukhdeo
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Climate change alters the structure of arctic marine food webs due to poleward shifts of boreal generalists.

Authors:  Susanne Kortsch; Raul Primicerio; Maria Fossheim; Andrey V Dolgov; Michaela Aschan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Increasing functional modularity with residence time in the co-distribution of native and introduced vascular plants.

Authors:  Cang Hui; David M Richardson; Petr Pyšek; Johannes J Le Roux; Tomáš Kučera; Vojtěch Jarošík
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.