Stella Watts1, Carsten F Dormann2, Ana M Martín González3, Jeff Ollerton4. 1. Landscape and Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, University of Northampton, Avenue Campus, St George's Avenue, Northampton NN2 6JD, UK hummingbird_pe@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Biometry and Environmental System Analysis, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Straße 4, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. 3. Pacific Ecoinformatics Computational Ecology Lab, 1604 McGee Ave., 94703 Berkeley, CA, USA Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. 4. Landscape and Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, University of Northampton, Avenue Campus, St George's Avenue, Northampton NN2 6JD, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Modularity is a ubiquitous and important structural property of ecological networks which describes the relative strengths of sets of interacting species and gives insights into the dynamics of ecological communities. However, this has rarely been studied in species-rich, tropical plant-pollinator networks. Working in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes we assessed the structure of quantitative plant-pollinator networks in nine valleys, quantifying modularity among networks, defining the topological roles of species and the influence of floral traits on specialization. METHODS: A total of 90 transects were surveyed for plants and pollinators at different altitudes and across different life zones. Quantitative modularity (QuanBiMo) was used to detect modularity and six indices were used to quantify specialization. KEY RESULTS: All networks were highly structured, moderately specialized and significantly modular regardless of size. The strongest hubs were Baccharis plants, Apis mellifera, Bombus funebris and Diptera spp., which were the most ubiquitous and abundant species with the longest phenologies. Species strength showed a strong association with the modular structure of plant-pollinator networks. Hubs and connectors were the most centralized participants in the networks and were ranked highest (high generalization) when quantifying specialization with most indices. However, complementary specialization d' quantified hubs and connectors as moderately specialized. Specialization and topological roles of species were remarkably constant across some sites, but highly variable in others. Networks were dominated by ecologically and functionally generalist plant species with open access flowers which are closely related taxonomically with similar morphology and rewards. Plants associated with hummingbirds had the highest level of complementary specialization and exclusivity in modules (functional specialists) and the longest corollas. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that the topology of networks in this tropical montane environment was non-random and highly organized. Our findings underline that specialization indices convey different concepts of specialization and hence quantify different aspects, and that measuring specialization requires careful consideration of what defines a specialist.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Modularity is a ubiquitous and important structural property of ecological networks which describes the relative strengths of sets of interacting species and gives insights into the dynamics of ecological communities. However, this has rarely been studied in species-rich, tropical plant-pollinator networks. Working in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes we assessed the structure of quantitative plant-pollinator networks in nine valleys, quantifying modularity among networks, defining the topological roles of species and the influence of floral traits on specialization. METHODS: A total of 90 transects were surveyed for plants and pollinators at different altitudes and across different life zones. Quantitative modularity (QuanBiMo) was used to detect modularity and six indices were used to quantify specialization. KEY RESULTS: All networks were highly structured, moderately specialized and significantly modular regardless of size. The strongest hubs were Baccharis plants, Apis mellifera, Bombus funebris and Diptera spp., which were the most ubiquitous and abundant species with the longest phenologies. Species strength showed a strong association with the modular structure of plant-pollinator networks. Hubs and connectors were the most centralized participants in the networks and were ranked highest (high generalization) when quantifying specialization with most indices. However, complementary specialization d' quantified hubs and connectors as moderately specialized. Specialization and topological roles of species were remarkably constant across some sites, but highly variable in others. Networks were dominated by ecologically and functionally generalist plant species with open access flowers which are closely related taxonomically with similar morphology and rewards. Plants associated with hummingbirds had the highest level of complementary specialization and exclusivity in modules (functional specialists) and the longest corollas. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that the topology of networks in this tropical montane environment was non-random and highly organized. Our findings underline that specialization indices convey different concepts of specialization and hence quantify different aspects, and that measuring specialization requires careful consideration of what defines a specialist.
Authors: Thomas C Ings; José M Montoya; Jordi Bascompte; Nico Blüthgen; Lee Brown; Carsten F Dormann; François Edwards; David Figueroa; Ute Jacob; J Iwan Jones; Rasmus B Lauridsen; Mark E Ledger; Hannah M Lewis; Jens M Olesen; F J Frank van Veen; Phil H Warren; Guy Woodward Journal: J Anim Ecol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.091
Authors: Matthias Schleuning; Jochen Fründ; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Stefan Abrahamczyk; Ruben Alarcón; Matthias Albrecht; Georg K S Andersson; Simone Bazarian; Katrin Böhning-Gaese; Riccardo Bommarco; Bo Dalsgaard; D Matthias Dehling; Ariella Gotlieb; Melanie Hagen; Thomas Hickler; Andrea Holzschuh; Christopher N Kaiser-Bunbury; Holger Kreft; Rebecca J Morris; Brody Sandel; William J Sutherland; Jens-Christian Svenning; Teja Tscharntke; Stella Watts; Christiane N Weiner; Michael Werner; Neal M Williams; Camilla Winqvist; Carsten F Dormann; Nico Blüthgen Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Jesper Sonne; Ana M Martín González; Pietro K Maruyama; Brody Sandel; Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni; Matthias Schleuning; Stefan Abrahamczyk; Ruben Alarcón; Andréa C Araujo; Francielle P Araújo; Severino Mendes de Azevedo; Andrea C Baquero; Peter A Cotton; Tanja Toftemark Ingversen; Glauco Kohler; Carlos Lara; Flor Maria Guedes Las-Casas; Adriana O Machado; Caio Graco Machado; María Alejandra Maglianesi; Alan Cerqueira Moura; David Nogués-Bravo; Genilda M Oliveira; Paulo E Oliveira; Juan Francisco Ornelas; Licléia da Cruz Rodrigues; Liliana Rosero-Lasprilla; Ana Maria Rui; Marlies Sazima; Allan Timmermann; Isabela Galarda Varassin; Zhiheng Wang; Stella Watts; Jon Fjeldså; Jens-Christian Svenning; Carsten Rahbek; Bo Dalsgaard Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Camila da Silva Goldas; Luciana Regina Podgaiski; Carolina Veronese Corrêa da Silva; Pedro Maria Abreu Ferreira; Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni; Milton de Souza Mendonça Journal: Oecologia Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 3.225