Literature DB >> 19020230

Primary breast cancer in men: clinical, imaging, and pathologic findings in 57 patients.

Jean Mathew1, George H Perkins, Tanya Stephens, Lavinia P Middleton, Wei-Tse Yang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to describe the imaging findings in primary breast cancer in men.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male patients from a single pathology database with the histologic diagnosis of breast cancer who had undergone preoperative mammography or sonography were included in this study. The mammograms and sonograms were retrospectively reviewed according to the American College of Radiology BI-RADS lexicon. Patients who did not have films available but had imaging reports available for review were also included. Sonograms of the regional nodal basins, including axillary, infraclavicular, internal mammary, and supraclavicular regions, were noted. Histopathology subtype of breast cancer and axillary nodal status were documented.
RESULTS: A total of 57 patients with imaging and 187 patients without imaging were included. The median age was 62 years (range, 19-80 years). Forty-nine patients had undergone both mammography and sonography; six, mammography alone; and two, sonography alone. Ninety-five percent (54/57) of patients presented with a palpable mass and 4% (2/57) with nipple inversion. At mammography, 69% (38/55) of cancers showed a mass; 29% (16/55), mass with microcalcifications; and 2% (1/55), microcalcifications. Gynecomastia was noted in 22 (40%) of 55 patients. Mammographic features included an irregular mass with spiculated or indistinct margins. Calcifications were typically pleomorphic and segmental. Sonographic features were typically an irregular mass with microlobulated margins. Axillary nodal involvement was present in 47% of patients. Most cancers were ductal carcinoma, either invasive or in situ.
CONCLUSION: Breast cancer in men characteristically presents as an irregular subareolar mass with spiculated or indistinct margins on mammography and can be associated with calcifications and gynecomastia. Sonography has a role in regional staging of lymph nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19020230     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  17 in total

1.  The Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography and Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Male Breast Disease: A New Algorithm.

Authors:  Zehra H Adibelli; Ozgur Oztekin; Hakan Postaci; Adam Uslu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Breast US as primary imaging modality for diagnosing gynecomastia.

Authors:  M Telegrafo; T Introna; L Coi; I Cornacchia; L Rella; A A Stabile Ianora; G Angelelli; M Moschetta
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2016 May-Jun

3.  Ultrasonography of the male breast.

Authors:  F Draghi; C C Tarantino; L Madonia; G Ferrozzi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2011-06-25

4.  Clinical examination allied to ultrasonography in the assessment of new onset gynaecomastia: an observational study.

Authors:  Ruvinder Kaur Athwal; Rosamund Donovan; Mehboob Mirza
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

5.  Shear-wave elastography quantitative assessment of the male breast: added value to distinguish benign and malignant palpable masses.

Authors:  Amandine Crombé; Gabrielle Hurtevent-Labrot; Maryam Asad-Syed; Jean Palussière; Gaetan MacGrogan; Michèle Kind; Stéphane Ferron
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Mammography Findings of Male Breast Diseases.

Authors:  Kadihan Yalçın Şafak
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-07-01

7.  Pictorial essay: Mammography of the male breast.

Authors:  Manju Bala Popli; V Popli; P Bahl; Y Solanki
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Image-based screening for men at high risk for breast cancer: Benefits and drawbacks.

Authors:  Ryan W Woods; Lonie R Salkowski; Mai Elezaby; Elizabeth S Burnside; Roberta M Strigel; Amy M Fowler
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 1.605

9.  Efficiency of Imaging Modalities in Male Breast Disease: Can Ultrasound Give Additional Information for Assessment of Gynecomastia Evolution?

Authors:  Özgür Sarıca; A Nedim Kahraman; Enis Öztürk; Memik Teke
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-01-01

10.  A Clinicopathological Evaluation of Male Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Enver Ilhan; Bakir Bati; Ali Alemdar; Ali Coskun; Arsenal Sezgin; Mehmet Yildirim; Omer Engin; Mete Purten
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.