Literature DB >> 19019975

A "gap effect" on stop signal reaction times in a human saccadic countermanding task.

Scott A Stevenson1, James K Elsley, Brian D Corneil.   

Abstract

The "gap effect" describes a phenomenon whereby saccadic reaction times are expedited by the removal of a visible fixation point prior to target presentation. Here we investigated whether processes controlling saccade cancellation are also subjected to a gap effect. Human subjects performed a countermanding experiment that required them to try to cancel an impending saccade in the presence of an imperative visual stop signal, across different fixation conditions. We found that saccadic cancellation latencies, estimated via derivation of the stop signal reaction time (SSRT), were approximately 40 ms shorter on trials with a 200-ms gap between fixation point removal and target presentation compared with when the fixation point remained illuminated. Follow-up experiments confirmed that the reduction in SSRTs were primarily due to removal of a foveal fixation point (as opposed to a generalized warning effect) and persisted with an auditory stop signal that controlled for potential differences in stop signal saliency across different fixation conditions. Saccadic RTs exhibited a gap effect in all experiments with reductions in RTs being due to both removal of a foveal fixation point and a generalized warning effect. Overall, our results demonstrate that processes controlling saccade cancellation can be expedited by a 200-ms gap. The simultaneous priming of both saccade cancellation and generation is of particular interest considering the mutually antagonistic relationship between the saccade fixation and generation networks in the oculomotor system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19019975     DOI: 10.1152/jn.90891.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Functional distinction between visuomovement and movement neurons in macaque frontal eye field during saccade countermanding.

Authors:  Supriya Ray; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Measurement of the extraocular spike potential during saccade countermanding.

Authors:  David C Godlove; Anna K Garr; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visual salience of the stop-signal affects movement suppression process.

Authors:  Roberto Montanari; Margherita Giamundo; Emiliano Brunamonti; Stefano Ferraina; Pierpaolo Pani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of probability bias in response readiness and response inhibition on reaching movements.

Authors:  Paolo Federico; Giovanni Mirabella
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Corrective response times in a coordinated eye-head-arm countermanding task.

Authors:  Gordon Tao; Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cognitive control and automatic interference in mind and brain: A unified model of saccadic inhibition and countermanding.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Anne Eileen Campbell; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Microsaccade production during saccade cancelation in a stop-signal task.

Authors:  David C Godlove; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Decoupling speed and accuracy in an urgent decision-making task reveals multiple contributions to their trade-off.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Veronica E Scerra; Christopher K Hauser; M Gabriela Costello; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.