Literature DB >> 19019788

Outline and surface disruption in animal camouflage.

Martin Stevens1, Isabel S Winney, Abi Cantor, Julia Graham.   

Abstract

Camouflage is an important strategy in animals to prevent predation. This includes disruptive coloration, where high-contrast markings placed at an animal's edge break up the true body shape. Successful disruption may also involve non-marginal markings found away from the body outline that create 'false edges' more salient than the true body form ('surface disruption'). However, previous work has focused on breaking up the true body outline, not on surface disruption. Furthermore, while high contrast may enhance disruption, it is untested where on the body different contrasts should be placed for maximum effect. We used artificial prey presented to wild avian predators in the field, to determine the effectiveness of surface disruption, and of different luminance contrast placed in different prey locations. Disruptive coloration was no more effective when comprising high luminance contrast per se, but its effectiveness was dramatically increased with high-contrast markings placed away from the body outline, creating effective surface disruption. A model of avian visual edge processing showed that surface disruption does not make object detection more difficult simply by creating false edges away from the true body outline, but its effect may also be based on a different visual mechanism. Our study has implications for whether animals can combine disruptive coloration with other 'conspicuous' signalling strategies.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19019788      PMCID: PMC2660950          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  Discrimination of oriented visual textures by poultry chicks.

Authors:  C D Jones; D Osorio
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching.

Authors:  H Martin Schaefer; Nina Stobbe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability.

Authors:  Stewart Fraser; Alison Callahan; Dana Klassen; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration.

Authors:  Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Testing Thayer's hypothesis: can camouflage work by distraction?

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Julia Graham; Isabel S Winney; Abi Cantor
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Enhancement of chromatic contrast increases predation risk for striped butterflies.

Authors:  Nina Stobbe; H Martin Schaefer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Theory of edge detection.

Authors:  D Marr; E Hildreth
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-02-29

9.  Visual pigments, oil droplets, ocular media and cone photoreceptor distribution in two species of passerine bird: the blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) and the blackbird (Turdus merula L.).

Authors:  N S Hart; J C Partridge; I C Cuthill; A T Bennett
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Innes C Cuthill; Amy M M Windsor; Hannah J Walker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  18 in total

1.  Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs.

Authors:  Claire N Spottiswoode; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Disruptive camouflage impairs object recognition.

Authors:  Richard J Webster; Christopher Hassall; Chris M Herdman; Jean-Guy J Godin; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  How camouflage works.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Context-dependent crypsis: a prey's perspective of a color polymorphic predator.

Authors:  D Rodríguez-Morales; V Rico-Gray; J G García-Franco; H Ajuria-Ibarra; L T Hernández-Salazar; L E Robledo-Ospina; D Rao
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-05-12

5.  Camouflage, detection and identification of moving targets.

Authors:  Joanna R Hall; Innes C Cuthill; Roland Baddeley; Adam J Shohet; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Cognition and the evolution of camouflage.

Authors:  John Skelhorn; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  False holes as camouflage.

Authors:  Leah M Costello; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Karin Kjernsmo; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are deceived by visual illusions during obstacle negotiation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Angelo Bisazza; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Adaptive body patterning, three-dimensional skin morphology and camouflage measures of the slender filefish Monacanthus tuckeri on a Caribbean coral reef.

Authors:  Justine J Allen; Derya Akkaynak; Arthur U Sugden; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.138

10.  Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; Alice E Lown; Anna E Hughes; Martin Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.