Literature DB >> 19019372

Relation between subject-specific hip joint loading, stress distribution in the proximal femur and bone mineral density changes after total hip replacement.

Ilse Jonkers1, Nicolas Sauwen, Gerlinde Lenaerts, Michiel Mulier, Georges Van der Perre, Siegfried Jaecques.   

Abstract

In the prediction of bone remodelling processes after total hip replacement (THR), modelling of the subject-specific geometry is now state-of-the-art. In this study, we demonstrate that inclusion of subject-specific loading conditions drastically influences the calculated stress distribution, and hence influences the correlation between calculated stress distributions and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after THR. For two patients who received cementless THR, personalized finite element (FE) models of the proximal femur were generated representing the pre- and post-operative geometry. FE analyses were performed by imposing subject-specific three-dimensional hip joint contact forces as well as muscle forces calculated based on gait analysis data. Average values of the von Mises stress were calculated for relevant zones of the proximal femur. Subsequently, the load cases were interchanged and the effect on the stress distribution was evaluated. Finally, the subject-specific stress distribution was correlated to the changes in BMD at 3 and 6 months after THR. We found subject-specific differences in the stress distribution induced by specific loading conditions, as interchanging of the loading also interchanged the patterns of the stress distribution. The correlation between the calculated stress distribution and the changes in BMD were affected by the two-dimensional nature of the BMD measurement. Our results confirm the hypothesis that inclusion of subject-specific hip contact forces and muscle forces drastically influences the stress distribution in the proximal femur. In addition to patient-specific geometry, inclusion of patient-specific loading is, therefore, essential to obtain accurate input for the analysis of stress distribution after THR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19019372     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

Review 1.  Advanced computational workflow for the multi-scale modeling of the bone metabolic processes.

Authors:  Tien Tuan Dao
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Revealing the unique features of each individual's muscle activation signatures.

Authors:  Jeroen Aeles; Fabian Horst; Sebastian Lapuschkin; Lilian Lacourpaille; François Hug
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification?

Authors:  Giordano Valente; Lorenzo Pitto; Debora Testi; Ajay Seth; Scott L Delp; Rita Stagni; Marco Viceconti; Fulvia Taddei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of femoral canal shape on mechanical stress distribution and adaptive bone remodelling around a cementless tapered-wedge stem.

Authors:  M Oba; Y Inaba; N Kobayashi; H Ike; T Tezuka; T Saito
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Sensitivity of a juvenile subject-specific musculoskeletal model of the ankle joint to the variability of operator-dependent input.

Authors:  Iain Hannah; Erica Montefiori; Luca Modenese; Joe Prinold; Marco Viceconti; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.617

6.  MRI-based anatomical characterisation of lower-limb muscles in older women.

Authors:  Erica Montefiori; Barbara M Kalkman; William H Henson; Margaret A Paggiosi; Eugene V McCloskey; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Peri-prosthetic bone remodeling of hydroxyapatite-coated compaction short stem was not affected by stem alignment.

Authors:  Shinya Hayashi; Yuichi Kuroda; Naoki Nakano; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Tomoyuki Kamenaga; Toshihisa Maeda; Takahiro Niikura; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Numerical test concerning bone mass apposition under electrical and mechanical stimulus.

Authors:  Diego A Garzón-Alvarado; Angélica M Ramírez-Martínez; Carmen Alicia Cardozo de Martínez
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.432

9.  Refining muscle geometry and wrapping in the TLEM 2 model for improved hip contact force prediction.

Authors:  Enrico De Pieri; Morten E Lund; Anantharaman Gopalakrishnan; Kasper P Rasmussen; David E Lunn; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.