Literature DB >> 19016585

Vertebral fracture status and the World Health Organization risk factors for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk.

Peiqi Chen1, John H Krege, Jonathan D Adachi, Jerilynn C Prior, Alan Tenenhouse, Jacques P Brown, Emmanuel Papadimitropoulos, Nancy Kreiger, Wojciech P Olszynski, Robert G Josse, David Goltzman.   

Abstract

Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture, and patients with prevalent vertebral fractures have a greater risk of future fractures. However, radiographically determined vertebral fractures are not identified as a distinct risk factor in the World Health Organization (WHO) fracture risk assessment tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare potential risk factors including morphometric spine fracture status and the WHO risk factors for predicting 5-yr fracture risk. We hypothesized that spine fracture status provides prognostic information in addition to consideration of the WHO risk factors alone. A randomly selected, population-based community cohort of 2761 noninstitutionalized men and women > or =50 yr of age living within 50 km of one of nine regional centers was enrolled in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMOS), a prospective and longitudinal cohort study following subjects for 5 yr. Prevalent and incident spine fractures were identified from lateral spine radiographs. Incident nonvertebral fragility fractures were determined by an annual, mailed fracture questionnaire with validation, and nonvertebral fragility fracture was defined by investigators as a fracture with minimal trauma. A model considering the WHO risk factors plus spine fracture status provided greater prognostic information regarding future fracture risk than a model considering the WHO risk factors alone. In univariate analyses, age, BMD, and spine fracture status had the highest gradient of risk. A model considering these three risk factors captured almost all of the predictive information provided by a model considering spine fracture status plus the WHO risk factors and provided greater predictive information than a model considering the WHO risk factors alone. The use of spine fracture status along with age and BMD predicted future fracture risk with greater simplicity and higher prognostic accuracy than consideration of the risk factors included in the WHO tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19016585      PMCID: PMC5101055          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.081103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  29 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A simple method for determining the probability a new vertebral fracture is present in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  J H Krege; K Siminoski; J D Adachi; D A Misurski; P Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  A Tenenhouse; L Joseph; N Kreiger; S Poliquin; T M Murray; L Blondeau; C Berger; D A Hanley; J C Prior
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  The impact of the use of multiple risk indicators for fracture on case-finding strategies: a mathematical approach.

Authors:  Chris De Laet; Anders Odén; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jönsson; John A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ali Guermazi; Andreas Mohr; Mikayel Grigorian; Bachir Taouli; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.777

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Didier Chalhoub; Ahmed M Kassem; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap in women: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  L-A Fraser; G Ioannidis; J D Adachi; L Pickard; S M Kaiser; J Prior; J P Brown; D A Hanley; W P Olszynski; T Anastassiades; S Jamal; R Josse; D Goltzman; A Papaioannou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Women with severe obesity and relatively low bone mineral density have increased fracture risk.

Authors:  S Cawsey; R Padwal; A M Sharma; X Wang; S Li; K Siminoski
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Vertebral size, bone density, and strength in men and women matched for age and areal spine BMD.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Kerry E Broe; Xiaochun Zhang; Elizabeth J Samelson; Ching-An Meng; Rajaram Manoharan; John D'Agostino; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Pitfalls in the external validation of FRAX.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Comparison between various fracture risk assessment tools.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Osteoporosis Canada 2010 guidelines for the assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Brian Lentle; Angela M Cheung; David A Hanley; William D Leslie; David Lyons; Alexandra Papaioannou; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; Anthony B Hodsman; Abida Sophina Jamal; Robert G Josse; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Suzanne Morin; Kerry Siminoski
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.248

8.  Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos.

Authors:  L-A Fraser; L Langsetmo; C Berger; G Ioannidis; D Goltzman; J D Adachi; A Papaioannou; R Josse; C S Kovacs; W P Olszynski; T Towheed; D A Hanley; S M Kaiser; J Prior; S Jamal; N Kreiger; J P Brown; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 10.  Sexual Dimorphism and the Origins of Human Spinal Health.

Authors:  Vicente Gilsanz; Tishya A L Wren; Skorn Ponrartana; Stefano Mora; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.