Literature DB >> 19015920

Responses of the pollinating wasp Ceratosolen solmsi marchali to odor variation between two floral stages of Ficus hispida.

Chun Chen1, Qishi Song.   

Abstract

During development of figs on Ficus hispida, only the female floral stage is receptive to its pollinator Ceratosolen solmsi marchali. After this stage, the quantity of fig odor decreases. The effects of F. hispida volatiles from receptive figs (figs at the female floral stage, when they are pollinated) and interfloral figs (between the female floral and male floral stages) on their pollinator were studied, together with responses to compounds present in the odor. Odors emitted by both receptive and interfloral figs were attractive to the pollinator. However, wasps preferred the odor of receptive figs to that of interfloral figs even though the quantity of interfloral volatiles increased. Three monoterpenes that included linalool (major constitutent) and two minor compounds limonene and beta-pinene from the receptive fig volatiles were used to test the pollinator responses. The levoisomer and racemic mixtures of linalool were attractive to the pollinator at high doses, but the dextroisomer was neutral. (+/-)-Limonene and (-)-beta-pinene at high doses were even less attractive to the pollinator than clean air and were neutral at low doses, while (R)-(+)-, (S)-(-)-limonene were neutral at all doses. In blend tests, all four mixtures of (+/-)-linalool or (S)-(-)-linalool combined with (+/-)-limonene or (-)-beta-pinene attracted C. solmsi marchali when administered at high doses. (R)-(+)-linalool and (-)-beta-pinene enhanced the attractiveness of (S)-(-)-linalool to the pollinator, while enantiomers of limonene did not. These results suggest that both quality and quantity of fig volatiles regulate C. solmsi marchali response and that quality is the main host-finding and floral stage-distinguishing cue for the pollinator. Synergistic effects of some compounds may play a role in enhancing attractiveness of the active compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19015920     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-008-9558-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biochemical and molecular genetic aspects of floral scents.

Authors:  N Dudareva; E Pichersky
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Specific attraction of fig-pollinating wasps: role of volatile compounds released by tropical figs.

Authors:  Laure Grison-Pigé; Jean-Marie Bessière; Martine Hossaert-McKey
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Fig volatile compounds--a first comparative study.

Authors:  Laure Grison-Pigé; Martine Hossaert-McKey; Jaco M Greeff; Jean-Marie Bessière
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.072

4.  Responses of fig wasps to host plant volatile cues.

Authors:  A B Ware; S G Compton
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Volatiles from Ficus hispida and their attractiveness to fig wasps.

Authors:  Q Song; D Yang; G Zhang; C Yang
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  The effect of pollination on floral fragrance in thistles.

Authors:  Nina Theis; Robert A Raguso
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Post-pollination emission of a repellent compound in a sexually deceptive orchid: a new mechanism for maximising reproductive success?

Authors:  Florian P Schiestl; Manfred Ayasse
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Differential attractiveness of induced odors emitted by eight maize varieties for the parasitoid cotesia marginiventris: is quality or quantity important?

Authors:  Maria Elena Fritzsche Hoballah; Cristina Tamò; Ted C J Turlings
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.626

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Exchange of hosts: can agaonid fig wasps reproduce successfully in the figs of non-host Ficus?

Authors:  Pei Yang; Zongbo Li; Yanqiong Peng; Darong Yang
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-01-20

2.  Floral scent contributes to interaction specificity in coevolving plants and their insect pollinators.

Authors:  Magne Friberg; Christopher Schwind; Lindsey C Roark; Robert A Raguso; John N Thompson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Flower bouquet variation in four species of Crocus ser. Verni.

Authors:  Angelino Carta; Guido Flamini; Pier Luigi Cioni; Luisa Pistelli; Lorenzo Peruzzi
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The mechanism of pollinator specificity between two sympatric fig varieties: a combination of olfactory signals and contact cues.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Stephen G Compton; Jin Chen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Chemical signal is in the blend: bases of plant-pollinator encounter in a highly specialized interaction.

Authors:  Magali Proffit; Benoit Lapeyre; Bruno Buatois; Xiaoxia Deng; Pierre Arnal; Flora Gouzerh; David Carrasco; Martine Hossaert-McKey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Terpenes and Terpenoids in Plants: Interactions with Environment and Insects.

Authors:  Delbert Almerick T Boncan; Stacey S K Tsang; Chade Li; Ivy H T Lee; Hon-Ming Lam; Ting-Fung Chan; Jerome H L Hui
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Daily rhythm of mutualistic pollinator activity and scent emission in Ficus septica: ecological differentiation between co-occurring pollinators and potential consequences for chemical communication and facilitation of host speciation.

Authors:  Lucie Conchou; Léa Cabioch; Lillian J V Rodriguez; Finn Kjellberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How to be a dioecious fig: Chemical mimicry between sexes matters only when both sexes flower synchronously.

Authors:  M Hossaert-McKey; M Proffit; C C L Soler; C Chen; J-M Bessière; B Schatz; R M Borges
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The Galling Truth: Limited Knowledge of Gall-Associated Volatiles in Multitrophic Interactions.

Authors:  Renee M Borges
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.753

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.