Literature DB >> 16273430

The effect of pollination on floral fragrance in thistles.

Nina Theis1, Robert A Raguso.   

Abstract

We investigated postpollination changes in fragrance composition and emission rates, as well as pollinator discrimination in hand-pollinated flower heads of two thistle species: Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and sandhill thistle (C. repandum). Following pollination, neither species emitted any novel compounds that could function as repellents. Scent emission rates declined in pollinated plants of both species by approximately 89% within 48 hr. This decline was evident in all 13 scent components of C. arvense. Apis mellifera, the dominant pollinator in the study population of C. arvense, was nearly three times more likely to visit an unpollinated rather than a pollinated flower head. A more complex pattern was observed for C. repandum, whose scent comprised 42 compounds. Quantities of aromatic and sesquiterpenoid volatiles declined after pollination, whereas two classes of scent compounds, fatty acid derivatives and monoterperpenoids, continued to be emitted. In C. repandum, discrimination against pollinated flower heads by Papilio palamedes (its primary pollinator) was not as marked. Unpollinated control plants of both species maintained moderate levels of scent production throughout this experiment, demonstrating that senescence and floral advertisement may be delayed until pollination has occurred. We expect postpollination changes in floral scent contribute to communication between plants with generalized pollinator spectra and their floral visitors. This study provides the first field study of such a phenomenon outside of orchids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16273430     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-005-7615-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  16 in total

1.  C6-volatiles derived from the lipoxygenase pathway induce a subset of defense-related genes.

Authors:  N J Bate; S J Rothstein
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  Remote perception of floral nectar by bumblebees.

Authors:  James H Marden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  CHANGES IN COROLLA COLOR AND OTHER FLORAL CHARACTERISTICS IN CRYPTANTHA HUMILIS (BORAGINACEAE): CUES TO DISCOURAGE POLLINATORS?

Authors:  Brenda B Casper; Timothy R La Pine
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Qualitative and quantitative analyses of flower scent in Silene latifolia.

Authors:  Stefan Dötterl; Lorne M Wolfe; Andreas Jürgens
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  Carbon allocation to volatiles and other reproductive components in male Ficus carica (Moraceae).

Authors:  L Grison-Pigé; J L Salager; M Hossaert-McKey; J Roy
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  FLORAL COLOR CHANGE IN LUPINUS ARGENTEUS (FABACEAE): WHY SHOULD PLANTS ADVERTISE THE LOCATION OF UNREWARDING FLOWERS TO POLLINATORS?

Authors:  David F Gori
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  THE EVOLUTION OF FLORAL COLOR CHANGE: POLLINATOR ATTRACTION VERSUS PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS IN FUCHSIA EXCORTICATA.

Authors:  Lynda F Delph; Curtis M Lively
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Acetyl-CoA:benzylalcohol acetyltransferase--an enzyme involved in floral scent production in Clarkia breweri.

Authors:  N Dudareva; J C D'Auria; K H Nam; R A Raguso; E Pichersky
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.417

9.  Overproduction of cytokinins in petunia flowers transformed with P(SAG12)-IPT delays corolla senescence and decreases sensitivity to ethylene.

Authors:  Hsiang Chang; Michelle L Jones; Gary M Banowetz; David G Clark
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Regulation of methylbenzoate emission after pollination in snapdragon and petunia flowers.

Authors:  Florence Negre; Christine M Kish; Jennifer Boatright; Beverly Underwood; Kenichi Shibuya; Conrad Wagner; David G Clark; Natalia Dudareva
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 11.277

View more
  11 in total

1.  Variation in highbush blueberry floral volatile profiles as a function of pollination status, cultivar, time of day and flower part: implications for flower visitation by bees.

Authors:  Cesar Rodriguez-Saona; Leonardo Parra; Andrés Quiroz; Rufus Isaacs
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Beetle visitations, and associations with quantitative variation of attractants in floral odors of Homalomena propinqua (Araceae).

Authors:  Yuko Kumano-Nomura; Ryohei Yamaoka
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Sources of floral scent variation: can environment define floral scent phenotype?

Authors:  Cassie J Majetic; Robert A Raguso; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-02

4.  Spatiotemporal Floral Scent Variation of Penstemon digitalis.

Authors:  Rosalie C F Burdon; Robert A Raguso; André Kessler; Amy L Parachnowitsch
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Fragrance of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) attracts both floral herbivores and pollinators.

Authors:  Nina Theis
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Postpollination changes in floral odor in Silene latifolia: adaptive mechanisms for seed-predator avoidance?

Authors:  Joëlle K Muhlemann; Marc O Waelti; Alex Widmer; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Diel variation in fig volatiles across syconium development: making sense of scents.

Authors:  Renee M Borges; Jean-Marie Bessière; Yuvaraj Ranganathan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Responses of the pollinating wasp Ceratosolen solmsi marchali to odor variation between two floral stages of Ficus hispida.

Authors:  Chun Chen; Qishi Song
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 9.  The Sweet Side of Plant-Specialized Metabolism.

Authors:  Thomas Louveau; Anne Osbourn
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 9.708

10.  Pollinator and herbivore attraction to cucurbita floral volatiles.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Andrews; Nina Theis; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 2.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.