Literature DB >> 19013507

The role of uropygial gland on sexual behavior in domestic chicken Gallus gallus domesticus.

Atsushi Hirao1, Masato Aoyama, Shoei Sugita.   

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated that avian social behavior is influenced by olfactory cues. During the reproductive season a change in the chemical composition of uropygial gland secretion has been reported in some species and the hypothesis that olfactory signals may be produced by this gland has been proposed. To examine this hypothesis we performed two behavioral experiments to determine whether a female's uropygial gland produces chemical signals that stimulate mating behaviors in domestic chickens. In Experiment 1 the role of the female's uropygial gland in male mating behavior was examined by removing and examining the female's uropygial gland. The frequency of mounts and copulations of intact male birds with sham-operated female birds was significantly higher than with uropygial glandectomized female birds. With respect to the number of waltzing that is one of the courtship displays intact males showed no significant difference between sham-operated female birds and uropygial glandectomized female birds. In Experiment 2 the relationship between male olfaction and the female's uropygial gland was investigated using olfactory bulbectomized male birds. The number of mounts and copulations of sham-operated male birds with sham-operated female bird was significantly higher than with uropygial glandectomized female birds. In contrast olfactory bulbectomized male birds showed no significant differences in the number of mounts and copulations between sham-operated female birds and uropygial glandectomized female birds. These results indicate that intact and sham-operated male birds prefer to mate with female birds with the uropygial gland. The number of courtship waltzing of sham-operated male birds showed no significant difference. However olfactory bulbectomized male birds significantly courted to uropygial glandectomized female birds. Summarizing our results show that while anosmic males did not have any preference, both intact and sham-operated male birds chose to mate with female birds having an intact uropygial gland, suggesting that mate preference involves in male olfaction and that the female's uropygial gland acts as a source of social odor cues in domestic chickens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19013507     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  16 in total

1.  An individual and a sex odor signature in kittiwakes?: study of the semiochemical composition of preen secretion and preen down feathers.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Thomas Merkling; Christine Raynaud; Géraldine Giacinti; Jean-Marie Bessière; Scott A Hatch; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-06-08

2.  Semiochemical compounds of preen secretion reflect genetic make-up in a seabird species.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Thomas Merkling; Christine Raynaud; Hervé Mulard; Jean-Marie Bessière; Emeline Lhuillier; Scott A Hatch; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Pigeon odor varies with experimental exposure to trace metal pollution.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Marion Chatelain; Anaïs Pessato; Bruno Buatois; Adrien Frantz; Julien Gasparini
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Songbird chemosignals: volatile compounds in preen gland secretions vary among individuals, sexes, and populations.

Authors:  Danielle J Whittaker; Helena A Soini; Jonathan W Atwell; Craig Hollars; Milos V Novotny; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 5.  The perfume of reproduction in birds: chemosignaling in avian social life.

Authors:  Samuel P Caro; Jacques Balthazart; Francesco Bonadonna
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Variation in preen oil composition pertaining to season, sex, and genotype in the polymorphic white-throated sparrow.

Authors:  Elaina M Tuttle; Peter J Sebastian; Amanda L Posto; Helena A Soini; Milos V Novotny; Rusty A Gonser
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  Pheromones in birds: myth or reality?

Authors:  Samuel P Caro; Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Role of testosterone in stimulating seasonal changes in a potential avian chemosignal.

Authors:  Danielle J Whittaker; Helena A Soini; Nicole M Gerlach; Amanda L Posto; Milos V Novotny; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Identification of avian wax synthases.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Biester; Janine Hellenbrand; Jens Gruber; Mats Hamberg; Margrit Frentzen
Journal:  BMC Biochem       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.059

10.  Fatty acyl-CoA reductases of birds.

Authors:  Janine Hellenbrand; Eva-Maria Biester; Jens Gruber; Mats Hamberg; Margrit Frentzen
Journal:  BMC Biochem       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.