Literature DB >> 21656004

An individual and a sex odor signature in kittiwakes?: study of the semiochemical composition of preen secretion and preen down feathers.

Sarah Leclaire1, Thomas Merkling, Christine Raynaud, Géraldine Giacinti, Jean-Marie Bessière, Scott A Hatch, Etienne Danchin.   

Abstract

The importance of olfaction in birds' social behavior has long been denied. Avian chemical signaling has thus been relatively unexplored. The black-legged kittiwake provides a particularly appropriate model for investigating this topic. Kittiwakes preferentially mate with genetically dissimilar individuals, but the cues used to assess genetic characteristics remain unknown. As in other vertebrates, their body odors may carry individual and sexual signatures thus potentially reliably signaling individual genetic makeup. Here, we test whether body odors in preen gland secretion and preen down feathers in kittiwakes may provide a sex and an individual signature. Using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, we found that male and female odors differ quantitatively, suggesting that scent may be one of the multiple cues used by birds to discriminate between sexes. We further detected an individual signature in the volatile and nonvolatile fractions of preen secretion and preen down feathers. These results suggest that kittiwake body odor may function as a signal associated with mate recognition. It further suggests that preen odor might broadcast the genetic makeup of individuals, and could be used in mate choice to assess the genetic compatibility of potential mates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656004     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-011-0809-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  50 in total

Review 1.  MHC genes, body odours, and odour preferences.

Authors:  C Wedekind; D Penn
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Comments on recent work by Zhang and colleagues: "Uropygial gland-secreted alkanols contribute to olfactory sex signals in budgerigars".

Authors:  Jérôme Mardon; Sandra M Saunders; Francesco Bonadonna
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Comparative genomic analysis identifies an evolutionary shift of vomeronasal receptor gene repertoires in the vertebrate transition from water to land.

Authors:  Peng Shi; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Odortypes: their origin and composition.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; G K Beauchamp; A Singer; J Bard; E A Boyse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Species, gender, and identity: cracking petrels' sociochemical code.

Authors:  Jérôme Mardon; Sandra M Saunders; Marti J Anderson; Charline Couchoux; Francesco Bonadonna
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Female marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) can be identified from the chemical composition of their scent marks.

Authors:  T E Smith; A J Tomlinson; J A Mlotkiewicz; D H Abbott
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  The skin microflora and the formation of human axillary odour.

Authors:  P J Rennie; D B Gower; K T Holland; A I Mallet; W J Watkins
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.970

8.  Responses to olfactory stimuli in spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta): II. Discrimination of conspecific scent.

Authors:  Christine M Drea; Sacha N Vignieri; H Sharon Kim; Mary L Weldele; Stephen E Glickman
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Essential role of the main olfactory system in social recognition of major histocompatibility complex peptide ligands.

Authors:  Marc Spehr; Kevin R Kelliher; Xiao-Hong Li; Thomas Boehm; Trese Leinders-Zufall; Frank Zufall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Olfactory sex recognition investigated in Antarctic prions.

Authors:  Francesco Bonadonna; Samuel P Caro; M de L Brooke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Semiochemical compounds of preen secretion reflect genetic make-up in a seabird species.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Thomas Merkling; Christine Raynaud; Hervé Mulard; Jean-Marie Bessière; Emeline Lhuillier; Scott A Hatch; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Pigeon odor varies with experimental exposure to trace metal pollution.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Marion Chatelain; Anaïs Pessato; Bruno Buatois; Adrien Frantz; Julien Gasparini
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  The perfume of reproduction in birds: chemosignaling in avian social life.

Authors:  Samuel P Caro; Jacques Balthazart; Francesco Bonadonna
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.587

4.  Reduced population size does not affect the mating strategy of a vulnerable and endemic seabird.

Authors:  Cristina Nava; Verónica C Neves; Malvina Andris; Marie-Pierre Dubois; Philippe Jarne; Mark Bolton; Joël Bried
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-11-15

Review 5.  Female-Based Patterns and Social Function in Avian Chemical Communication.

Authors:  Danielle J Whittaker; Julie C Hagelin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Variation in preen oil composition pertaining to season, sex, and genotype in the polymorphic white-throated sparrow.

Authors:  Elaina M Tuttle; Peter J Sebastian; Amanda L Posto; Helena A Soini; Milos V Novotny; Rusty A Gonser
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Songbird preen oil odour reflects haemosporidian parasite load.

Authors:  K M Talbott; D J Becker; H A Soini; B J Higgins; M V Novotny; E D Ketterson
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Wax Ester Composition of Songbird Preen Oil Varies Seasonally and Differs between Sexes, Ages, and Populations.

Authors:  Leanne A Grieves; Mark A Bernards; Elizabeth A MacDougall-Shackleton
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Preen gland removal increases plumage bacterial load but not that of feather-degrading bacteria.

Authors:  Gábor Arpád Czirják; Péter László Pap; Csongor István Vágási; Mathieu Giraudeau; Cosmin Mureşan; Pascal Mirleau; Philipp Heeb
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-01-04

10.  Uropygial gland size and composition varies according to experimentally modified microbiome in Great tits.

Authors:  Staffan Jacob; Anika Immer; Sarah Leclaire; Nathalie Parthuisot; Christine Ducamp; Gilles Espinasse; Philipp Heeb
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.