Literature DB >> 19013354

In-vitro activity of tigecycline against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii in Taiwan determined by the broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods.

Chun-Hsing Liao1, Hsiang-Chi Kung, Gwo-Jong Hsu, Po-Liang Lu, Yung-Ching Liu, Chih-Ming Chen, Chun-Ming Lee, Wu Sun, Tsrang-Neng Jang, Ping-Cherng Chiang, Yu-Jen Cheng, Hsiu-Chen Lin, Zhi-Yuan Shi, Lih-Shinn Wang, Yin-Ching Chuang, Shih-Ming Tsao, Chin-Te Lu, Jien-Wei Liu, Cheng-Hua Huang, Po-Ren Hsueh.   

Abstract

A total of 393 isolates of A. baumannii were collected from patients treated at 19 teaching hospitals in Taiwan. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and inhibitory zone diameters for tigecycline were determined by the broth microdilution method and the disk diffusion method, respectively. The MIC results were interpreted using the US FDA tigecycline susceptibility breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae (susceptible [S] <or=2 microg/mL; intermediate [I] 4 microg/mL; resistant [R] >or=8 microg/mL). The disk diffusion results were interpreted by criteria recommended by Jones et al. (S >or=16 mm; I 13-15 mm; R <or=12 mm) and also by those recommended by the US FDA for Enterobacteriaceae (S >or=19 mm; I 15-18 mm; R <or=14 mm). The percentages of susceptible, intermediate and resistant isolates determined by the broth microdilution method were 80.9%, 12.2%, and 6.9%, respectively. The rates of susceptible, intermediate and resistant isolates by the disk diffusion method using the criteria of Jones et al. were 88.3%, 9.9% and 1.8% and using the US FDA criteria were 44.0%, 51.7% and 4.3%. Using the criteria recommended by Jones et al., the total error rate of the disk diffusion method in comparison with the broth microdilution method was 14.2% (56/393). For routine susceptibility testing of tigecycline against A. baumannii the broth microdilution method, not the disk diffusion method, should be used due to the poor correlation of results between these two methods interpreted either by the Jones et al. or US FDA criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19013354     DOI: 10.1016/S0924-8579(08)70027-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  9 in total

1.  Overexpression of the adeB gene in clinical isolates of tigecycline-nonsusceptible Acinetobacter baumannii without insertion mutations in adeRS.

Authors:  Jun-Ren Sun; Ming-Chin Chan; Tein-Yao Chang; Wei-Yao Wang; Tzong-Shi Chiueh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Genetic Variability of AdeRS Two-Component System Associated with Tigecycline Resistance in XDR-Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates.

Authors:  S Montaña; E Vilacoba; G M Traglia; M Almuzara; M Pennini; A Fernández; A Sucari; D Centrón; M S Ramírez
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Agreement assessment of tigecycline susceptibilities determined by the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods among commonly encountered resistant bacterial isolates: results from the Tigecycline In Vitro Surveillance in Taiwan (TIST) study, 2008 to 2010.

Authors:  Jien-Wei Liu; Wen-Chien Ko; Cheng-Hua Huang; Chun-Hsing Liao; Chin-Te Lu; Yin-Ching Chuang; Shih-Ming Tsao; Yao-Shen Chen; Yung-Ching Liu; Wei-Yu Chen; Tsrang-Neng Jang; Hsiu-Chen Lin; Chih-Ming Chen; Zhi-Yuan Shi; Sung-Ching Pan; Jia-Ling Yang; Hsiang-Chi Kung; Chun-Eng Liu; Yu-Jen Cheng; Yen-Hsu Chen; Po-Liang Lu; Wu Sun; Lih-Shinn Wang; Kwok-Woon Yu; Ping-Cherng Chiang; Ming-Hsun Lee; Chun-Ming Lee; Gwo-Jong Hsu; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: From bench to bedside.

Authors:  Ming-Feng Lin; Chung-Yu Lan
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  In vitro activity of tigecycline against clinical isolates of carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex in Pretoria, South Africa.

Authors:  Nahid H Ahmed; Kamaldeen Baba; Cornelis Clay; Ruth Lekalakala; Anwar A Hoosen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-05-03

6.  Evaluation of the synergistic effect of a combination of colistin and tigecycline against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacterbaumannii.

Authors:  Ilkem Acar Kaya; Muberra Devrim Guner; Gulcin Akca; Semra Tuncbilek; Aslihan Alhan; Emin Tekeli
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 7.  Insight into Acinetobacter baumannii: pathogenesis, global resistance, mechanisms of resistance, treatment options, and alternative modalities.

Authors:  Muhammad Asif; Iqbal Ahmad Alvi; Shafiq Ur Rehman
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 8.  Tigecycline antibacterial activity, clinical effectiveness, and mechanisms and epidemiology of resistance: narrative review.

Authors:  Sajad Yaghoubi; Angelina Olegovna Zekiy; Marcela Krutova; Mehrdad Gholami; Ebrahim Kouhsari; Mohammad Sholeh; Zahra Ghafouri; Farajolah Maleki
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  In Vitro Activity of Tigecycline and Colistin against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii in Hospitals in Tehran and Bandar-Abbas, Iran.

Authors:  Shahin Najar Peerayeh; Afsaneh Karmostaji; Soraya Sharifi Sarasiabi; Sedigheh Javadpour; Parivash Davoodian; Nahid Moradi
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2014-07-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.