Literature DB >> 19011193

Safety of brain 3-T MR imaging with transmit-receive head coil in patients with cardiac pacemakers: pilot prospective study with 51 examinations.

Claas P Naehle1, Carsten Meyer, Daniel Thomas, Susann Remerie, Carsten Krautmacher, Harold Litt, Roger Luechinger, Rolf Fimmers, Hans Schild, Torsten Sommer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brain in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers (PMs) by using a transmit-receive head coil.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board. Signed informed consent was obtained from all subjects. In vitro testing at 3 T was performed with 32 PMs and 45 PM leads that were evaluated for force and torque (by using a floating platform) and radiofrequency (RF)-related heating by using a transmit-receive head coil (maximum specific absorption rate, 3.2 W/kg). Patient examinations at 3 T were performed in 44 patients with a cardiac PM and a strong clinical need; patients underwent a total of 51 MR examinations of the brain by using a transmit-receive head coil to minimize RF exposure of the PM system. An electrocardiograph and pulse oximetry were used for continuous monitoring during MR imaging. The technical and functional PM status was assessed prior to and immediately after MR imaging and at 3 months thereafter. Serum troponin I level was measured before and 12 hours after imaging to detect myocardial thermal injury. PM reprogramming was performed prior to MR imaging depending on the patient's intrinsic heart rate (< 60 beats per minute, asynchronous pacing; > or = 60 beats per minute, sense-only mode).
RESULTS: For in vitro testing, the maximum translational force was 2150 mN (mean, 374.38 mN +/- 392.75 [standard deviation]), and maximum torque was 17.8 x 10(-3) N x m (mean, [2.29 +/- 4.08] x 10(-3) N x m). The maximum temperature increase was 2.98 degrees C (mean, 0.16 degrees C +/- 0.45). For patient examinations, all MR examinations (51 of 51) were completed safely. There were no significant (P < .05) changes in lead impedance, pacing capture threshold level, or serum troponin I level.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the brain at 3 T in patients with a cardiac PM can be performed safely when dedicated safety precautions (including the use of a transmit-receive head coil) are taken. RSNA, 2008

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19011193     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493072195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

1.  A protocol for patients with cardiovascular implantable devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): should defibrillation threshold testing be performed post-(MRI).

Authors:  Peter Thomas Burke; Hamid Ghanbari; Patrick B Alexander; Michael K Shaw; Marcos Daccarett; Christian Machado
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): Two further aspects.

Authors:  Claas P Nähle; Roger Lüchinger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  John V Higgins; Robert E Watson; Allan S Jaffe; Connie Dalzell; Nancy Acker; Joel P Felmlee; Samuel J Asirvatham; Yong-Mei Cha; Paul A Friedman; Suraj Kapa
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Ensuring safety of implanted devices under MRI using reversed RF polarization.

Authors:  William R Overall; John M Pauly; Pascal P Stang; Greig C Scott
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Cardiac implanted electronic devices and MRI safety in 2018-the state of play.

Authors:  Ryan Mark Shulman; Ben Hunt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Ariel Roguin; Dorith Goldsher; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Brian S Caffo; Kevin D Frick; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  [Safe MRI examinations in patients with pacemakers and ICD].

Authors:  D Beitzke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  [Pacemaker and MRI in clinical practice].

Authors:  A Fendt; M Strauß; K Kouraki; R Zahn; T Kleemann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Effects of external electrical and magnetic fields on pacemakers and defibrillators: from engineering principles to clinical practice.

Authors:  Roy Beinart; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.