Literature DB >> 19010859

[18F]Fluorothymidine positron emission tomography before and 7 days after gefitinib treatment predicts response in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Hee-Jung Sohn1, You-Jung Yang, Jin-Sook Ryu, Seung Jun Oh, Ki Chun Im, Dae Hyuk Moon, Dae Ho Lee, Cheolwon Suh, Jung-Shin Lee, Sang-We Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine (FLT)-positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting response and patient outcome of gefitinib therapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Nonsmokers with advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the lung were eligible. FLT-PET images of the thorax were obtained before and 7 days after the start of gefitinib (250 mg/d) therapy, the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of primary tumors were measured, and the percent changes in SUVmax were calculated. After 6 weeks of therapy, the responses were assessed by computed tomography of the chest.
RESULTS: Among 31 patients who were enrolled, we analyzed 28 patients for whom we had complete data. Chest computed tomography revealed partial response in 14 (50%), stable disease in 4 (14%), and progressive disease in 10 (36%) after 6 weeks of treatment. Pretreatment SUVmax of the tumors did not differ between responders and nonresponders. At 7 days after the initiation of therapy, the percent changes in SUVmax were significantly different (-36.0 +/- 15.4% versus 10.1 +/- 19.5%; P < 0.001). Decrease of > 10.9% in SUVmax was used as the criterion for predicting response. The positive and negative predictive values were both 92.9%. The time to progression was significantly longer in FLT-PET responders than nonresponders (median, 7.9 versus 1.2 months; P = 0.0041).
CONCLUSION: FLT-PET can predict response to gefitinib 7 days after treatment in nonsmokers with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. The change in tumor SUVmax obtained by FLT-PET seems to be a promising predictive variable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19010859     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  60 in total

1.  A novel in vitro assay to assess phosphorylation of 3'-[(18)F]fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine.

Authors:  Ning Guo; Jingping Xie; H Charles Manning; Natasha G Deane; M Sib Ansari; Robert J Coffey; John Gore; Ronald R Price; Ronald M Baldwin; J Oliver McIntyre
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]-3'-deoxy-3'fluorothymidine (FLT) as a predictor of outcome in patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby; Robert J Myerson; Ilke Nalbantoglu; Changqing Ma; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Development of radiotracers for oncology--the interface with pharmacology.

Authors:  Rohini Sharma; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  PET imaging of tumor growth: not as easy as it looks.

Authors:  Anthony F Shields
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Multiplexed PET probes for imaging breast cancer early response to VEGF₁₂₁/rGel treatment.

Authors:  Min Yang; Haokao Gao; Xilin Sun; Yongjun Yan; Qimeng Quan; Wendy Zhang; Khalid A Mohamedali; Michael G Rosenblum; Gang Niu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Radiopharmaceuticals as probes to characterize tumour tissue.

Authors:  Israt S Alam; Mubarik A Arshad; Quang-Dé Nguyen; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Molecular imaging in clinical trials.

Authors:  Debra Josephs; James Spicer; Michael O'Doherty
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 8.  Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Federico Turkheimer; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  PET in the management of locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

Authors:  Willem Grootjans; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Esther G C Troost; Eric P Visser; Wim J G Oyen; Johan Bussink
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Molecular imaging to guide systemic cancer therapy: Illustrative examples of PET imaging cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Austin R Pantel; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 8.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.