PURPOSE: One of the main challenges of lung cancer research is identifying patients at high risk for recurrence after surgical resection. Simple, accurate, and reproducible methods of evaluating individual risks of recurrence are needed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Based on a combined analysis of time-to-recurrence data, censoring information, and microarray data from a set of 138 patients, we selected statistically significant genes thought to be predictive of disease recurrence. The number of genes was further reduced by eliminating those whose expression levels were not reproducible by real-time quantitative PCR. Within these variables, a recurrence prediction model was constructed using Cox proportional hazard regression and validated via two independent cohorts (n = 56 and n = 59). RESULTS: After performing a log-rank test of the microarray data and successively selecting genes based on real-time quantitative PCR analysis, the most significant 18 genes had P values of <0.05. After subsequent stepwise variable selection based on gene expression information and clinical variables, the recurrence prediction model consisted of six genes (CALB1, MMP7, SLC1A7, GSTA1, CCL19, and IFI44). Two pathologic variables, pStage and cellular differentiation, were developed. Validation by two independent cohorts confirmed that the proposed model is significantly accurate (P = 0.0314 and 0.0305, respectively). The predicted median recurrence-free survival times for each patient correlated well with the actual data. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an accurate, technically simple, and reproducible method for predicting individual recurrence risks. This model would potentially be useful in developing customized strategies for managing lung cancer.
PURPOSE: One of the main challenges of lung cancer research is identifying patients at high risk for recurrence after surgical resection. Simple, accurate, and reproducible methods of evaluating individual risks of recurrence are needed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Based on a combined analysis of time-to-recurrence data, censoring information, and microarray data from a set of 138 patients, we selected statistically significant genes thought to be predictive of disease recurrence. The number of genes was further reduced by eliminating those whose expression levels were not reproducible by real-time quantitative PCR. Within these variables, a recurrence prediction model was constructed using Cox proportional hazard regression and validated via two independent cohorts (n = 56 and n = 59). RESULTS: After performing a log-rank test of the microarray data and successively selecting genes based on real-time quantitative PCR analysis, the most significant 18 genes had P values of <0.05. After subsequent stepwise variable selection based on gene expression information and clinical variables, the recurrence prediction model consisted of six genes (CALB1, MMP7, SLC1A7, GSTA1, CCL19, and IFI44). Two pathologic variables, pStage and cellular differentiation, were developed. Validation by two independent cohorts confirmed that the proposed model is significantly accurate (P = 0.0314 and 0.0305, respectively). The predicted median recurrence-free survival times for each patient correlated well with the actual data. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed an accurate, technically simple, and reproducible method for predicting individual recurrence risks. This model would potentially be useful in developing customized strategies for managing lung cancer.
Authors: Jin-Soo Kim; Edward S Kim; Diane Liu; J Jack Lee; Luisa Solis; Carmen Behrens; Scott M Lippman; Waun Ki Hong; Ignacio I Wistuba; Ho-Young Lee Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Matthew D Wilkerson; Xiaoying Yin; Katherine A Hoadley; Yufeng Liu; Michele C Hayward; Christopher R Cabanski; Kenneth Muldrew; C Ryan Miller; Scott H Randell; Mark A Socinski; Alden M Parsons; William K Funkhouser; Carrie B Lee; Patrick J Roberts; Leigh Thorne; Philip S Bernard; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Olivier Gevaert; Jiajing Xu; Chuong D Hoang; Ann N Leung; Yue Xu; Andrew Quon; Daniel L Rubin; Sandy Napel; Sylvia K Plevritis Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sophie Rousseaux; Alexandra Debernardi; Baptiste Jacquiau; Anne-Laure Vitte; Aurélien Vesin; Hélène Nagy-Mignotte; Denis Moro-Sibilot; Pierre-Yves Brichon; Sylvie Lantuejoul; Pierre Hainaut; Julien Laffaire; Aurélien de Reyniès; David G Beer; Jean-François Timsit; Christian Brambilla; Elisabeth Brambilla; Saadi Khochbin Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Elena Martínez-Terroba; Carmen Behrens; Fernando J de Miguel; Jackeline Agorreta; Eduard Monsó; Laura Millares; Cristina Sainz; Miguel Mesa-Guzman; José Luis Pérez-Gracia; María Dolores Lozano; Javier J Zulueta; Ruben Pio; Ignacio I Wistuba; Luis M Montuenga; María J Pajares Journal: J Pathol Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 7.996