Literature DB >> 19007621

Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction.

.   

Abstract

This Practice Committee Opinion reviews the published literature relating to the potential benefits, pitfalls, and risks of blastocyst culture.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 19007621     DOI： 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN： 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Federico Cirillo; Antonella Smeraldi; Emanuela Morenghi; Giulia E G Mulazzani; Elena Albani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Supernumerary blastocyst cryopreservation: a key prognostic indicator for patients opting for an elective single blastocyst transfer (eSBT).

Authors:  Christine Mullin; Alan S Berkeley; Jamie A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Blastocyst transfer ameliorates live birth rate compared with cleavage-stage embryos transfer in fresh in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: reviews and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Wang; Hai-Xiang Sun
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Clinical outcome of fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfers in ethnic Chinese ART patients.

Authors:  Guo Qing Tong; Shan Ren Cao; Xun Wu; Jun Qiang Zhang; Ji Cui; Boon Chin Heng; Xiu Feng Ling
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.234
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.