Literature DB >> 19005058

Ambiguous pitch and the temporal representation of inharmonic iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus.

Mark Sayles1, Ian M Winter.   

Abstract

Neural coding of the pitch of complex sounds is vital for animals' ability to communicate and to perceptually organize natural acoustic scenes. Harmonic complex sounds typically have a well defined pitch corresponding to their fundamental frequency, whereas inharmonic sounds can exhibit pitch ambiguity: their pitch can have more than one value. Iterated rippled noise (IRN), a common "pitch stimulus," is generated from broadband noise by a cascade of delay-and-add steps, with the delayed noise phase-shifted by varphi degrees. By varying varphi, the (in)harmonicity, and therefore the pitch ambiguity, of IRN can be manipulated. Recordings were made from single-units in the ventral cochlear nucleus of anesthetized guinea pigs in response to IRN and complex tones, systematically varying the inharmonicity. In their all-order interspike interval distributions, primary-like and chopper units tuned within the phase-locking range of best frequencies represent the waveform temporal fine structure (which varies with varphi). In contrast, those units tuned to higher frequencies represent the temporal-envelope modulation (independent of varphi). We show a temporal representation of ambiguous pitch for IRN and complex tones based on responses to the stimulus fine structure. Within the dominance region for pitch this representation follows the predictions of classic human behavioral experiments and provides a unifying contribution to possible neuro-temporal explanations for the pitch shift and pitch ambiguity associated with many inharmonic sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19005058      PMCID: PMC6671654          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3137-08.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  11 in total

Review 1.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

2.  Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.

Authors:  Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Spatiotemporal representation of the pitch of harmonic complex tones in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 5.  Subcortical pathways: Towards a better understanding of auditory disorders.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Boris Gourévitch; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Neural ensemble codes for stimulus periodicity in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Kerry M M Walker; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Reverberation impairs brainstem temporal representations of voiced vowel sounds: challenging "periodicity-tagged" segregation of competing speech in rooms.

Authors:  Mark Sayles; Arkadiusz Stasiak; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-12

8.  Octopus Cells in the Posteroventral Cochlear Nucleus Provide the Main Excitatory Input to the Superior Paraolivary Nucleus.

Authors:  Richard A Felix Ii; Boris Gourévitch; Marcelo Gómez-Álvarez; Sara C M Leijon; Enrique Saldaña; Anna K Magnusson
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Modulation of the Primary Auditory Thalamus When Recognizing Speech with Background Noise.

Authors:  Paul Glad Mihai; Nadja Tschentscher; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Short term depression unmasks the ghost frequency.

Authors:  Tjeerd V Olde Scheper; Huibert D Mansvelder; Arjen van Ooyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.