Literature DB >> 19004573

External validation of the updated partin tables in a cohort of French and Italian men.

Naeem Bhojani1, Laurent Salomon, Umberto Capitanio, Nazareno Suardi, Shahrokh F Shariat, Claudio Jeldres, Laurent Zini, Daniel Pharand, François Péloquin, Philippe Arjane, Claude C Abbou, Alexandre De La Taille, Francesco Montorsi, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the discrimination and calibration properties of the newly developed 2007 Partin Tables in two European cohorts with localized prostate cancer.
METHODS: Data on clinical and pathologic characteristics were obtained for 1,064 men treated with radical prostatectomy at the Creteil University Health Center in France (n = 839) and at the Milan University Vita-Salute in Italy (n = 225). Overall discrimination was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, which quantified the accuracy of stage predictions for each center. Calibration plots graphically explored the relationship between predicted and observed rates of extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and lymph node invasion (LNI).
RESULTS: The rates of ECE, SVI, and LNI were 28%, 14%, and 2% in the Creteil cohort vs. 11%, 5%, and 5% in the Milan cohort. In the Creteil cohort, the accuracy of ECE, SVI, and LNI prediction was 61%, 71%, and 82% vs. 66%, 92% and 75% for the Milan cohort. Important departures were recorded between Partin Tables' predicted and observed rates of ECE, SVI, and LNI within both cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: The 2007 Partin Tables demonstrated worse performance in European men than they originally did in North American men. This indicates that predictive models need to be externally validated before their implementation into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19004573     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

Review 1.  Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Biomarker research in prostate cancer--towards utility, not futility.

Authors:  Sheng Fei Oon; Stephen R Pennington; John M Fitzpatrick; R William G Watson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Role for (11)C-choline PET in active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oleksandr Boychak; Larissa Vos; William Makis; Francois-Alexandre Buteau; Nadeem Pervez; Matthew Parliament; Alexander J B McEwan; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance.

Authors:  Larissa J Vos; Michele Janoski; Keith Wachowicz; Atiyah Yahya; Oleksandr Boychak; John Amanie; Nadeem Pervez; Matthew B Parliament; Edith Pituskin; B Gino Fallone; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

5.  The need for, and utilization of prostate-bed radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer in British Columbia.

Authors:  Scott Tyldesley; Michael Peacock; James W Morris; Alan So; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Jill Quirt; Michael Carter; Tom Pickles
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Novel predictive tools for Irish radical prostatectomy pathological outcomes: development and validation.

Authors:  D M Fanning; F Yue; J M Fitzpatrick; R W G Watson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Preoperative Predictors of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer (pT3a) in a Contemporary Indian Cohort.

Authors:  Sohrab Arora; Gagan Gautam; Rakesh Khera; Rajesh K Ahlawat
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-06-17

8.  Assessment of the performance of Partin's nomogram (2007) in contemporary Indian cohort.

Authors:  Rajiv Yadav; Sohrab Arora; Manish Sachdeva; Narmada Prasad Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  International multicentre study examining selection criteria for active surveillance in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  L-M Wong; D E Neal; R B Johnston; N Shah; N Sharma; A Y Warren; C M Hovens; S Larry Goldenberg; M E Gleave; A J Costello; N M Corcoran
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Evaluation of prediction models for the staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Susie Boyce; Yue Fan; Ronald William Watson; Thomas Brendan Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.