Literature DB >> 19002517

Cardiovascular disease management: the need for better diagnostics.

John J Ricotta1, Jose Pagan, Michalis Xenos, Yared Alemu, Shmuel Einav, Danny Bluestein.   

Abstract

Current diagnostic testing for cardiovascular pathology usually rests on either physiological or anatomic measurement. Multiple tests must then be combined to arrive at a conclusion regarding treatment of a specific pathology. Much of the diagnostic decisions currently made are based on rough estimates of outcomes, often derived from gross anatomic observations or extrapolation of physical laws. Thus, intervention for carotid and coronary disease is based on estimates of diameter stenosis, despite data to suggest that plaque character and lesion anatomy are important determinants of outcome. Similarly, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) intervention is based on maximal aneurysm diameter without regard for arterial wall composition or individual aneurysm geometry. In other words, our current diagnostic tests do not reflect the sophistication of our current knowledge of vascular disease. Using a multimodal approach, computer modeling has the potential to predict clinical outcomes based on a variety of factors including arterial wall composition, surface anatomy and hemodynamic forces. We term this more sophisticated approach "patient specific diagnostics", in which the computer models are reconstructed from patient specific clinical visualizing modalities, and material properties are extracted from experimental measurements of specimens and incorporated into the modeling using advanced material models (including nonlinear anisotropic models) and performed as dynamic simulations using the FSI (fluid structure interaction) approach. Such an approach is sorely needed to improve the effectiveness of interventions. This article will review ongoing work in "patient specific diagnostics" in the areas of carotid, coronary and aneurismal disease. We will also suggest how this approach may be applicable to management of aortic dissection. New diagnostic methods should allow better patient selection, targeted intervention and modeling of the results of different therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19002517     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-008-0416-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  37 in total

1.  Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology.

Authors:  Morton J Kern; Amir Lerman; Jan-Willen Bech; Bernard De Bruyne; Eric Eeckhout; William F Fearon; Stuart T Higano; Michael J Lim; Martijn Meuwissen; Jan J Piek; Nico H J Pijls; Maria Siebes; Jos A E Spaan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices.

Authors:  Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek; Julien I E Hoffman; Maria Siebes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease.

Authors:  P G Hagan; C A Nienaber; E M Isselbacher; D Bruckman; D J Karavite; P L Russman; A Evangelista; R Fattori; T Suzuki; J K Oh; A G Moore; J F Malouf; L A Pape; C Gaca; U Sechtem; S Lenferink; H J Deutsch; H Diedrichs; J Marcos y Robles; A Llovet; D Gilon; S K Das; W F Armstrong; G M Deeb; K A Eagle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Natural history of asymptomatic carotid plaque. Five year follow-up study.

Authors:  L W O'Holleran; M M Kennelly; M McClurken; J M Johnson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Model prediction of subendocardial perfusion of the coronary circulation in the presence of an epicardial coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Jeroen P H M van den Wijngaard; Christina Kolyva; Maria Siebes; Jenny Dankelman; Martin J C van Gemert; Jan J Piek; Jos A E Spaan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  The unstable plaque.

Authors:  Michael G Hennerici
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A Halliday; A Mansfield; J Marro; C Peto; R Peto; J Potter; D Thomas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Biomechanical interaction between cap thickness, lipid core composition and blood pressure in vulnerable coronary plaque: impact on stability or instability.

Authors:  Gérard Finet; Jacques Ohayon; Gilles Rioufol
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.439

9.  Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm - FSI modelling.

Authors:  Danny Bluestein; Kris Dumont; Matthieu De Beule; John Ricotta; Paul Impellizzeri; Benedict Verhegghe; Pascal Verdonck
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.763

10.  Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Marc Schermerhorn; Robert Zwolak; Omaida Velazquez; Michel Makaroun; Ronald Fairman; Jack Cronenwett
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 1.466

View more
  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of an algorithm for arterial lumen diameter measurements by means of ultrasound.

Authors:  Magnus Cinthio; Tomas Jansson; Anders Eriksson; Asa Rydén Ahlgren; Hans W Persson; Kjell Lindström
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges.

Authors:  Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.667

3.  Patient-specific simulations of transcatheter aortic valve stent implantation.

Authors:  C Capelli; G M Bosi; E Cerri; J Nordmeyer; T Odenwald; P Bonhoeffer; F Migliavacca; A M Taylor; S Schievano
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Personalised imaging and biomechanical modelling of large vessels.

Authors:  Rob Krams; Marcel Breeuwer; Frans van de Vosse
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Current progress in patient-specific modeling.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; Roy Kerckhoffs
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  The effect of angulation in abdominal aortic aneurysms: fluid-structure interaction simulations of idealized geometries.

Authors:  Michalis Xenos; Yared Alemu; Dan Zamfir; Shmuel Einav; John J Ricotta; Nicos Labropoulos; Apostolos Tassiopoulos; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Integration of Different Risk Assessment Tools to Improve Stratification of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  S Paredes; T Rocha; P de Carvalho; J Henriques; J Morais; J Ferreira
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  A patient-specific study of type-B aortic dissection: evaluation of true-false lumen blood exchange.

Authors:  Duanduan Chen; Matthias Müller-Eschner; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; David Barber; Dittmar Böckler; Rod Hose; Yiannis Ventikos
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  The role of biofluid mechanics in the assessment of clinical and pathological observations: sixth International Bio-Fluid Mechanics Symposium and Workshop, March 28-30, 2008 Pasadena, California.

Authors:  Maria Siebes; Yiannis Ventikos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Finite state machine implementation for left ventricle modeling and control.

Authors:  Jacob M King; Clint A Bergeron; Charles E Taylor
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.