Literature DB >> 19001701

A method of dosimetry for synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy using radiochromic films of different sensitivity.

J C Crosbie1, I Svalbe, S M Midgley, N Yagi, P A W Rogers, R A Lewis.   

Abstract

This paper describes a method of film dosimetry used to measure the peak-to-valley dose ratios for synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT). Two types of radiochromic film (manufactured by International Specialty Products, NJ, USA) were irradiated in a phantom and also flush against a microbeam collimator (beam width 25 microm, centre-to-centre spacing 200 microm) on beamline BL28 B2 at the SPring-8 synchrotron. Four experiments are reported: (1) the HD-810 and EBT varieties of radiochromic film were used to record 'peak' dose and 'valley' (regions in between peaks) dose, respectively; (2) a stack of HD-810 film sheets was microbeam-irradiated and analysed to investigate a possible dose build-up effect; (3) a very high MRT dose was delivered to HD-810 film to elicit a measurable valley dose to compare with the result obtained using broad beam radiation; (4) the half value layer of the beam with and without the microbeam collimator was measured to investigate the effect of the collimator on the beam quality. The valley dose obtained for films placed flush against the collimator was approximately 0.2% of the peak dose. Within the water phantom, the valley dose had increased to between 0.7 and 1.8% of the peak dose, depending on the depth in the phantom. We also demonstrated, experimentally and by Monte Carlo simulation, that the dose is not maximal on the surface and that there is a dose build-up effect. The microbeam collimator did not make an appreciable difference to the beam quality. The values of the peak-to-valley ratio reported in this paper are higher than those predicted by previously published Monte Carlo simulation papers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001701     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/23/014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

1.  Fiber-optic detector for real time dosimetry of a micro-planar x-ray beam.

Authors:  Matthew D Belley; Ian N Stanton; Mike Hadsell; Rachel Ger; Brian W Langloss; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Sha X Chang; Michael J Therien; Terry T Yoshizumi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Biodosimetric quantification of short-term synchrotron microbeam versus broad-beam radiation damage to mouse skin using a dermatopathological scoring system.

Authors:  R C U Priyadarshika; J C Crosbie; B Kumar; P A W Rogers
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A first generation compact microbeam radiation therapy system based on carbon nanotube X-ray technology.

Authors:  M Hadsell; J Zhang; P Laganis; F Sprenger; J Shan; L Zhang; L Burk; H Yuan; S Chang; J Lu; O Zhou
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Evaluating the peak-to-valley dose ratio of synchrotron microbeams using PRESAGE fluorescence.

Authors:  N Annabell; N Yagi; K Umetani; C Wong; M Geso
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.616

5.  In situ biological dose mapping estimates the radiation burden delivered to 'spared' tissue between synchrotron X-ray microbeam radiotherapy tracks.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Jeffrey C Crosbie; Frances Daley; Sarah Bourne; Paul R Barber; Borivoj Vojnovic; Leonie Cann; Peter A W Rogers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neurocognitive sparing of desktop microbeam irradiation.

Authors:  Soha Bazyar; Christina R Inscoe; Thad Benefield; Lei Zhang; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Yueh Z Lee
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  An evaluation of dose equivalence between synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy and conventional broad beam radiation using clonogenic and cell impedance assays.

Authors:  Mohammad Johari Ibahim; Jeffrey C Crosbie; Yuqing Yang; Marina Zaitseva; Andrew W Stevenson; Peter A W Rogers; Premila Paiva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sparing of tissue by using micro-slit-beam radiation therapy reduces neurotoxicity compared with broad-beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Naritoshi Mukumoto; Masao Nakayama; Hiroaki Akasaka; Yasuyuki Shimizu; Saki Osuga; Daisuke Miyawaki; Kenji Yoshida; Yasuo Ejima; Yasushi Miura; Keiji Umetani; Takeshi Kondoh; Ryohei Sasaki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 9.  Blood-Brain Barrier Modulation to Improve Glioma Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Huilong Luo; Eric V Shusta
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 6.321

10.  Monte Carlo simulations of EBT3 film dose deposition for percentage depth dose (PDD) curve evaluation.

Authors:  Spencer M Robinson; Nolan Esplen; Derek Wells; Magdalena Bazalova-Carter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.